• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Lynnie

SoWal Insider
Apr 18, 2007
8,151
434
SoBuc
taking over warrantees







subsidizing purchases



propping up the bubble



keeping the bills paid

There is some good news in this - the hard line stance taken to force these companies to restructure. I'm actually impressed they did this, I wasn't expecting it from this administration. The devil is in the details however, we wont know for months what hard decisions they actually have to make. In the mean time the American taxpayer will continue to fund these failed businesses with loans. Hopefully we aren't making a losing investment.

So, does this strategy replace BK? If so, we should abolish the US Bankruptcy Court, Code, Judges, etc.... and have the government get into each of our pocketbooks in this fashion. You're right about the 'devil in the details.' I presume it will be more of us bailing them out and they will generate a whopping 100,000 in new car sales this year......for a country of 300,000,000, that's .0003 - still not enough to keep them in business. But, am optimistic that this will work! :D
 

Lynnie

SoWal Insider
Apr 18, 2007
8,151
434
SoBuc

scooterbug44

SoWal Expert
May 8, 2007
16,706
3,339
Sowal
When I first say the reports I thought it would be AIG part deux, but this is apparently a more reasonable long term payout of pension that he has actually earned/accrued.

Not saying he's worth that, but it seems less crazy. One would THINK there could be some pucking clauses added about how if you F up so poorly that the government takes over and fires you, you don't get these things.
 

30ashopper

SoWal Insider
Apr 30, 2008
6,845
3,471
59
Right here!
When I first say the reports I thought it would be AIG part deux, but this is apparently a more reasonable long term payout of pension that he has actually earned/accrued.

Not saying he's worth that, but it seems less crazy. One would THINK there could be some pucking clauses added about how if you F up so poorly that the government takes over and fires you, you don't get these things.


I don't think you can blame him entirely. He enherited a mess that stetches back to the 70's and even before that. I wouldn't have wanted his job. I think he was too soft - but his choice was unltimately the fault of the board and the voters. With GM I think its all about looking forward and hoping they finally get a chance to fix the mess that's been building for decades. This crisis might be just what they need, assuming congress doesn't screw it up.
 

FloridaBuckeye

Beach Lover
Sep 4, 2008
164
16
assuming congress doesn't screw it up.

That is the part that bothers me!! :)
 

scooterbug44

SoWal Expert
May 8, 2007
16,706
3,339
Sowal
I am not blaming him for the entire thing, just once again questioning basically paying millions to the chauffeur for crashing the limo. Not 100% their fault, but they did probably have a bit to do with it (best analogy I could thing of at the moment as pilot and plane didn't seem to work)
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter