I'm cool with a connector that runs from San Juan to 395 or one that skirts the state park boundary from where Collaborations used to be to 395 with maybe 2 north/south connections i.e. San Juan. Dividing the state forest is not an option and I feel that any decision should include the following at the beginning:
THIS IS TO FIX AN EXISTING PROBLEM NOT PROMOTE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
In fact it should be added to the LDC that this route cannot be used to justify development.
San Juan is a residential road that would not accommodate the traffic or help fix things. Not only would it have the same bottleneck dumping on to 395, it's less than a quarter of a mile from 395. It's also in the middle of a subdivision (an old one but still a subdivision), that would not be met well turning into a county road with a ton of traffic. Not sure why it's even in the discussion.