I just find it interesting that DBPR is involved. We are starting to get a lot of code cases where actual residents are complaining about the investors who have what amount to this mini-motels running. I have been struggling with where you draw the line between a single family dwelling and an actual commercial enterprise. Since I do not need DBPR to rent out my house and it appears these vacation rental ventures do, the line may become much clearer. I wonder how this is going to sit with convenants that strictly prohibit commercial operations and this obvious commercial use. Thanks for the reference I will review this weekend.
The DBPR is over the division of Hotels and Restaurants. The line is pretty clear, anything less than 6 months is governed as Public Lodging. Anything over 6 months is considered long term rental and governed under Real Estate law. I'm not sure if that designation is made by actual amount of time spent in the unit or if it is governed by the contract/lease. I'm sure shallowsnole could enlighten us.
As far as covenants and restrictions I'm not sure. While it does fall under commercial I don't believe that it would be restricted. Generally the reason for restricting commercial operations in covenants and restrictions is to prevent someone from running an auto body shop out of their garage or a beauty saloon in their living room.