The internet is the CB Radio of the 90's.
-statement made a decade ago by a senior VP at ABC.
The internet is the CB Radio of the 90's.
aquaticbiology said:Last one, then I've got to get back to work (clearing tons of debris out of the fish pondsyeech!). Handheld is the best (battery power and car adapter and house adapter are all cheap and easily available and it uses AA batteries!). No antenna to install, etc and it can go with you. Boat radios just don't go as far as cb and frs (family radios) are chock full of idiots and quacking (literally) children.
Hmmm... CB's been 5 watts since the get-go. Only recent difference is FCC dropped license requirement around 1980. I used a nice little cobra back in '70s in truck driving days. Downsides - tech hasn't changed over the years, effective range still more or less 4 miles (sometimes slightly better with no obsticles - I've got maybe 5-8 miles on a really good day talking to someboday with a fixed - tall - tower). Technically, a GMRS at 5 watts has a better effective range, and GMRS does technically require an FCC license. Bottom line, range into double digits usually requires a substantial external antenna.aquaticbiology said:here be my 2cents:
1. A back up communications system in place - good old CB radio - car and mobile units are now 5 watts and go for miles, no license required, not monitored and battery powered/low power requirements, with 40 channels to choose from for your 'sowal channel' - ain't nothing else that won't be jammed with idiots talking on and on about the storm.
OhioBeachBum said:Hmmm... CB's been 5 watts since the get-go. Only recent difference is FCC dropped license requirement around 1980. I used a nice little cobra back in '70s in truck driving days. Downsides - tech hasn't changed over the years, effective range still more or less 4 miles (sometimes slightly better with no obsticles - I've got maybe 5-8 miles on a really good day talking to someboday with a fixed - tall - tower). Technically, a GMRS at 5 watts has a better effective range, and GMRS does technically require an FCC license. Bottom line, range into double digits usually requires a substantial external antenna.
Right about the chatter even on GMRS, and even with coded squelch. That is the upside of CB (not near as much traffic now as heydays in the '70s). Reasonably spaced relay can work OK - and if one happens to have a nice heathy old vintage '70s portable 12VDC Black Cat linear laying around for "emergency use", a full 15' antenna on the 'ole jeep, (and a healthy battery), so much the better.aquaticbiology said:And each CB equipped individual extends the reach of the communications chain by repeating whatever message is being broadcast down the chain.
The news reports are increasingly clear that a major problem with Katrina is that the communications broke down because (1) there wasn't an effective plan in place and (2) they didn't have communication technologies in place thta would work well without traditional power sources.
Also, the message is clear that one may not be able to get immediate help from government sources -- that may take a few days.
So, some communication steps would be (and could be organized through this board -- isn't that wonderful...):
1. Agree upon what communication system could be used under the worst circumstances (no power, lots of water)
2. Make sure enough people in the area have compatible communication systems and know they are part of the emergency network
3. Try them out in advance with the different people who share the communication network
4. Have a plan for communicating with each other and practice a few times
5. Have a way for people outside that communication system to get and give information if possible.
I believe this is the only way citizens will have a working sytem in place if the government doesn't have one immediately. It's good to have a back-up plan.