We may be receiving 5% on short-term cash, but isn't inflation over 3%? After taxes, we're not far from even. Of course, I do acknowledge ( and sleep well because of) the no-downside aspect of these accounts.
Real estate has traditionally been for patient investors. Our frenzied market defied all logic for a while, as we all know. But I predict that long-range investors will do well if purchasing today.
Maybe it all boils down to risk tolerance.
Lively discussion encouraged.
One way of deciding what housing prices might do in the future is to look at history. And what we find is that since the late 1960's, median home prices have been on a very consistent tend line with a consistent slope ... until of course 2002/03. So if you believe (as I do) that there has been no "game changer" event that would permanently move median home pricing off of its trend line, then you could conclude that prices would drop back down to the line ... and this would give you the "should" cost of the median home.
When I do it, I get a 20% price drop in the median US home price -- I don't think that it is terribly unreasonable to extrapolate this across the rest of the market since median home prices rose at similiar rates to the rest of the market during the boom period (could be less in under-heated markets, and more in overheated markets).
And, to determine how long it will take to get back to the peak market pricing of last year, draw the two lines out (diagonal slope line and horizontal line from peak) and see where they meet ... looks like about 2014 to me.
Of course if you throw in a souring economy, bad loan and debt situations, and deteriorating consumer confidence, pricing could drop below the tend line for awhile.
So, to answer the question posed, I do indeed believe that cash is a better
investment than real estate for the next 3 year period. Having said that though, when I see the market conditions that I am looking for that indicate a bottom, I will DEFINATELY be a buyer (with the cash that I have that's earning 5.3%;-)).