SJ...from your post #17:
Since I first found out about the four new developments in BMB on Big Redfish Lake, I have been against all four. The impact will be tremendous. For years, I have stated that Walton County needs more public parking for the beach accesses. On any given day in the season, the 83 access is full. Now, you are going to have two developments sending more people to that location. Parking has also been critical at Grayton Beach.
Didn't mean to imply that you said two developments were trying to get private access. The question was meant to ask just who is the second development. Were you thinking of the development adjacent and north of Redfish Village? Isn't that called Lakefront? I could be wrong about the name.
If Redfish Village developers gets permission to use the lot at 260 Blue Mountain Rd. as a private access for it's owners, guests, renters and invitees, what is to stop the Redfish Village home owners association from selling a right to use the access to the Lakefront development and/or others? The current Redfish Village developers will have sold their condos and moved on to their next project; they don't care and the neighborhood has no protection from the continued and additional abuse of 75 feet of beach as a dumping ground.
That name Lakefront (or maybe Lakeplace) at Redfish sounds right. I hear your concern about the homeowners association for Redfish Village selling rights to use the access. However, as I understand from the attorney frepresenting Redfish Village, only Redfish Village owners and guests, will be allowed to use thprivate access, and that language would be incorporated into the deed for that private access property, and it would remain forever with the property.
Last edited: