Two different strategies, but what they both agreed upon was that it was best to attack Iraq before they had the ability to attack the USA. Because one chose to run a two week attack, and the other chose to spend billions of dollars on a never-ending war, does make a difference in the two campaigns, but both were scared of Iraq's future capabilities of producing and firing nuclear weapons. All I am asking is, was it right for Bill Clinton to launch an attack on Iraq, in a preemptive strike?
Perfect example of the reason why you should teach them to not believe everything they read on the internet and in the newspapers.I just don't want my great grand-daughters logging on to sowal.com one day and reading their granny/nanny trashin' the first woman president. ;-)No way! :nono1:
Misquotes like that are just wrong Tootsie and are crossing the line in my opinion. 
It's been like that for how long, days now? Fix it already, huh, rather than trashing me! 
Hilarious.