There were not 60,000 folks at the Palin rally. It was about half that -- still very impressive. So call it even.
I just snorted.
Conservative Seattle Times Endorses Obama
- Thread starter rapunzel
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
I just snorted.
get in line...you need a spanking, too.
get real
My thread on sex ed was meant for pro-McCain folks. it was in no way misleading as the facts are that the bill called for age-appropriate sex education in grades K-12. If anyone can produce a shred of evidence that the bill reads differently, then please show it to me.
Kurt, what was the original title of my thread??? I was not aware of any editorial changes. Doesn't it usually indicate edited by and the person that edited it. I do not see such a notation on that first post. I think the moderators are playing favorites big time.
thought you were done with the whining part, friend.
this thread was intended for pro obama folks. it was not really meant to lure you or others in and misinform them, as other very misleading thread titles are meant to do by some folks.
Punzy knows the rules and she follows them rather well. She used the same exact title as used in the real news.
My thread on sex ed was meant for pro-McCain folks. it was in no way misleading as the facts are that the bill called for age-appropriate sex education in grades K-12. If anyone can produce a shred of evidence that the bill reads differently, then please show it to me.
Kurt, what was the original title of my thread??? I was not aware of any editorial changes. Doesn't it usually indicate edited by and the person that edited it. I do not see such a notation on that first post. I think the moderators are playing favorites big time.
prove it
I posted a link to a news story stating there were 60,000 people, can you produce a news story refuting it or are we just supposed to believe it because you are "enlightened."
There were not 60,000 folks at the Palin rally. It was about half that -- still very impressive. So call it even.
I posted a link to a news story stating there were 60,000 people, can you produce a news story refuting it or are we just supposed to believe it because you are "enlightened."
I think about 60,000 showed-up but poor planning on the campaign's part caused an unfortunate conflict with the south Florida early bird dining period and roughly half of the assembled fox trotted off for the nearest $5.99 steak dinner.
TooFarTampa
SoWal Insider
I don't know anything about the question mark; if you want to ask Kurt a question, sometimes it is better to PM him directly because he doesn't always keep an eye on every thread.
Here's the Miami Herald story, which was headlined "Sarah Palin Excites Huge Florida Crowd." It is a highly complimentary story.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/story/696050.html
You don't even know what your own title was? And what do you mean by playing favorites?
rebut
No, I believe the thread's original title is just as it reads. But Kurt, a moderator, claims it had to be altered to make it less misleading. Typically, when a post is edited there is a notation that it was edited, with the date, time, and person that edited it.
look below this line, it shows when it was edited and that I did it.
No, I believe the thread's original title is just as it reads. But Kurt, a moderator, claims it had to be altered to make it less misleading. Typically, when a post is edited there is a notation that it was edited, with the date, time, and person that edited it.
look below this line, it shows when it was edited and that I did it.
Last edited:
Is this not what keeps feeding the racial aspect, comments like this. I saw on a bumper sticker on a car, in the south, Africian Americans for Obama. I thought to myself, now what purpose is that, why could it not say families for Obama or something besides that. That is what makes me mad is his campaign is the one bringing the race card into the campaign.