So, as a disinterested party (don't own at Edgewater; don't know Suzanne Harris or Shela) if I'm keeping up here, Shela thinks that Suzanne Harris is in some way responsible for the hazardous retention pond that was egregiously put in place of a coastal dune lake that wasn't a coastal dune lake but, instead, a pond that wasn't always a pond but, instead, a lilypad-filled cypress stand without too many cypress trees (which I think is called a "bog", at best). The floating facts are that DEP deemed the retention pond compliant, meaning Ms Harris isn't responsible and there is seeming no real problem, which makes Shela mad (because she doesn't like Ms Harris). One truth is that the retention pond might be considered by some as more ugly that a swampy bog. Nonetheless, facts aside (other than that Shela doesn't like Ms Harris) the next tact is to try to incite public outcry by floating the notion that the retention pond is more hazardous to the safety of our children than a natural snake-infested mosquito breeding ground (where I'm sure that we'd all be okay with our kids frolicking). Sounds like it would be more straight-forward to say that (1) Shela doesn't like Ms Harris, (2) Shela doesn't like the retention pond next to her piece of Paradise, (3) Sheila doesn't like the outcome from the complaint....that is what this is really about.