• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Misty

Banned
Dec 15, 2011
2,769
752
People across Walton County are scratching their heads about who is “behind” the election advertising being placed by the shadowy Washington, D.C., group “Our Generation.”

We’ll probably never know. But do we need to?

Our Generation’s history as an organization should have Walton County voters very uncomfortable about trusting anything that this group has to say — regardless of who is paying for the mailings, online videos and spam emails and text that are bombarding Walton County voters.

Specifically, Our Generation has been rocked by allegations that it runs complicated schemes to “scam” senior citizens of their retirement money — with proceeds totaling millions of dollars. Newspapers in the state of Washington, Tennessee, California and Illinois have all written about Our Generation’s tactics. According to these reports, the group sends official-looking mailers to senior citizens asking them to send donations to save “the senior center,” or to pay to complete a “National Census” survey — with all proceeds apparently going right back to the organization’s coffers, not to a local senior center or government entity.

One newspaper described these tactics as a “financial scam.” Another called it a “mail scam.” And yet another called it a “scam target(ing) senior citizens.” The Better Business Bureau has reported that these mailings are alleged “scare tactics,” and has given Our Generation a grade of “F” for horrible behavior.

Federal lawmakers have sharply criticized the group. One member of Congress described Our Generation’s mailers as a “poorly veiled attempt to trick seniors into providing their credit card information,” while another Congressman described the organization’s activities as a “scam.”

Why would an organization do this? The answer is: It’s all about money.

Publicly available financial reports show that the organization uses funds from their mailings simply to raise more money. Money raised by a mailing goes directly to fundraising companies that are owned by individuals who serve (or served previously) on Our Generation’s board. For example, one company that is owned by a leader of Our Generation was paid $2.3 million by the organization in just one year. They raise money from seniors so that they can keep making money for the purpose of raising more money. A vicious circle that generates an endless money loop with very little public policy involved.

A review of Our Generation’s “Changing the World” blogs on its website shows some of the only public policy changes the group advocates are giving clemency to imprisoned drug dealers and advocating senior citizens’ use of marijuana. Is this the sort of Washington, D.C., group we need “informing” us how to vote in Walton County?


Given this information, Melanie Nipper and Bill Fletcher, the Walton County Commission candidates who are benefiting from Our Generation’s largesse, should consider sending cease-and-desist letters to the organization demanding that they stop their activities and they should publicly renounce the organization’s advertisements — both the positive advertisements about themselves and glut of negative hit pieces on their opponents.

It’s time to look out for the next generation — not to believe the propaganda from “Our Generation.” Walton County voters will prove they won’t be scammed when they vote on August 30th.

Michael L. Weimorts, Esq., is a resident of Point Washington.

(Guest Column appeared in today's Sunday Paper by the NWFL Daily News.)
 

Misty

Banned
Dec 15, 2011
2,769
752
If this isn't the "pot calling the kettle" from a member of the Walton County Small Business Association who has literally funded Tony Anderson's campaign and ensured (bought! in my opinion) C. Jones seat on the BCC and has/is backing Bill Imfield and William Chapman.

No agenda here folks...move along.
 

Misty

Banned
Dec 15, 2011
2,769
752
Mr. Weimorts, I can't say what I'd really like to say about you or what I've documented from court records but suffice it to say you do have an agenda as does the WCSBA!
 

John G

Beach Fanatic
Jul 16, 2014
1,800
553
Its pretty simple stuff. If you pay attention, it's about this "Customary Use" nonsense and separating candidates that do and do not support it. That's why the ads specifically attack Chapman and Imfeld.

No secret that I am not in favor of Customary Use, as it is currently being defined. I support the idea of private property, just like the guy in the DeFuniak Harold editorial that talks about "trespassing" on his property up North in the county. Same thing folks.

I'll agree with Misty that the pot calling the kettle black definitely applies here.

While Wemorts writes a nice piece, its not something that is going to affect many voters. It looks more like a plea to people to not support Nipper and Fletcher due to their somewhat undefined stances on Customary Use. It's my understanding that each of them have deferred to form a formal opine until the courts have decided.

The Small Business Group wants Customary Use so there can be more small businesses. The oppose a business license at the same time.

More small businesses (no so bad idea) but no business licenses (no so good idea). Why do we favor Customary Use yet are so resistant to a business license. Really, is there anywhere else besides here that doesn't have some sort of business license, registration, etc.?
 

Danny Glidewell

Beach Fanatic
Mar 26, 2008
725
914
Glendale
Why do we need a business license? If the cost is only 35 dollars then there will be little in the way of enforcement because that amount will not generate enough funds to pay for the resources necessary to enforce the ordinance. We cannot manage to enforce ordinances that we have enforcement funding for such as the beach activities ordinance. Google will provide the information the Chamber or the fire department may need. To me this seems like just another paper-pushing inititative for the government to indulge in. Maybe this will be a good project for the new city government but we do not need more government and more fees and more paperwork in the county.
 

Jenksy

Beach Fanatic
Oct 25, 2012
828
631
No secret that I am not in favor of Customary Use, as it is currently being defined. I support the idea of private property, just like the guy in the DeFuniak Harold editorial that talks about "trespassing" on his property up North in the county. Same thing folks.

Not the same thing. A lot of residents around here believe some bureaucrat decades ago illegally told some beachfront owner that they could sell the beach. To us it's like telling you now you own the road in front of your house so feel free to add it to your deed legal description.
 

Patriot Games

Beach Lover
Aug 28, 2014
230
208
Ok danny, How do you define and prove who's a business? And how do you deal with the guy with 6 trucks in his neighborhood who says "I'm not a business, I ain't got a license." Basic covenants that protect residential neighborhoods have nothing to hang their hat on. Remember the para sailer who drug the two girls into the side of a building?
Unlicensed business and Bay county was drug into the lawsuit for not having any regulation to ensure the public was safe. If it happens here, will the county say it's never been an issue so we were unaware. Licenses are about covering their butt.Licenses are proof of a professional, would you like to get on a Delta flight with a pilot with no license. Have you ever seen a cop pull over a plane and check the pilots license? But when an accident occurs, I guarantee the lawyers want to know if he had one. It's about the county being run like a business.
 

Misty

Banned
Dec 15, 2011
2,769
752
Why do we need a business license? If the cost is only 35 dollars then there will be little in the way of enforcement because that amount will not generate enough funds to pay for the resources necessary to enforce the ordinance. We cannot manage to enforce ordinances that we have enforcement funding for such as the beach activities ordinance. Google will provide the information the Chamber or the fire department may need. To me this seems like just another paper-pushing inititative for the government to indulge in. Maybe this will be a good project for the new city government but we do not need more government and more fees and more paperwork in the county.


If you are a legitimate business operating in Walton County, why would you need enforcement? I don't own a business so really have no dog in the fight either way but I do see it as a way to protect legitimate business from shady, fly by the seat of your pants operations. Historically, code enforcement has never enforced anything either, not in SoWal anyway.

Evidently NoWal plays by a different set of rules.
 

Gillian Messier

Beach Comber
Aug 2, 2016
45
1
Biz licenses are part of the evolution of a community. They are like dog licenses. They are implemented not because of the good dogs but because of the bad dogs.

And because of a few dog haters don't know the difference between the good ones and the bad ones and won't shut up about it.
 

Danny Glidewell

Beach Fanatic
Mar 26, 2008
725
914
Glendale
It just sounds a lot to me like another ordinance that will not be enforced and only the good people will obey. 35 dollars is not even enough to fund the paper pushing.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter