Unplugged said:Well said WiLe - I think many of us echo your sentiments...
Ditto
Unplugged said:Well said WiLe - I think many of us echo your sentiments...
Just_In_Thyme said:Things just don't look that glum do they Shelly?
WiLe said:Why don't you read your link? A 3.2% INCREASE is not a "slower" tourist season.
I don't understand how you interpret the information to mean that we will have a "slower tourist season." If more people come, does this mean that the lines to get into restaurants will be longer and thus slower to move, or does it simply mean that service will be slower because more people are here? I guess it could also mean that traffic will be slower. :funn: You really know how to state your case, Shelly.SHELLY said:It is "slower" if one experienced a 7% increases in years past. Let's put it this way: If condo prices increased 25% in the last 3 years and now condo prices will increase 5% in 2006 year versus 25% in 2005 that would be "slower" appreciation--No?
Personally, I think tourism will do OK as long as folks who recently bought rental houses/condos at SKY-HIGH prices (and increasing costs) don't expect to crack a profit. Nothing will scare the tourists away faster than being told their "usual" rental condo went from $1400 to $2500 per week.
Smiling JOe said:I don't understand how you interpret the information to mean that we will have a "slower tourist season."
WiLe said:If there was "greater fool theory" at work, that point was passed several months ago and the last person who threw money in it at the peak and can't hold on until things get better, probably already knows he's in hot water at this point, don't you think?