• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

30A Skunkape

Skunky
Jan 18, 2006
10,315
2,349
55
Backatown Seagrove
Cold hard fact of the day:more people log on to SOWAL.com than tune in poor Keith on any given day. Where is he tonight anyway, looking for some, ahem, little blue pills?:lol:
 

Chickpea

Beach Fanatic
Dec 15, 2005
1,151
366
30-A Corridor
Rapunzel,
Well stated and refuted - AND I will add that it is also insulting and demeaning to the thousands of Iraqis that have also died because of this needless, senseless war to only talk of Americans who have also needlessly paid the highest sacrifice for this administration.
 

LuciferSam

Banned
Apr 26, 2008
4,749
1,069
Sowal
If I were responsible for the mess we are in, I don't think I'd be able to function at all much less play golf. That's how I perceive Bush right now.
 

LuciferSam

Banned
Apr 26, 2008
4,749
1,069
Sowal
Cold hard fact of the day:more people log on to SOWAL.com than tune in poor Keith on any given day. Where is he tonight anyway, looking for some, ahem, little blue pills?:lol:


Let's compare MSNBC to Faux News. Faux gets a lot of crossover viewership. A lot of MSNBC enthusiasts are willing to tune in to Faux News to get their daily absurdity fix. Diehard Faux News viewers possess no similar craving for logic, reason, rationality, science, humor, you name it. Is there anything more entertaining than listening to that Doofus Ollie North take on lightweight Alan Colmes while Hannitty rudely spits out barbs and chuckles from the peanut gallery? OK so maybe Faux News does have humor.
 

Teresa

SoWal Guide
Staff member
Nov 15, 2004
30,893
9,500
South Walton, FL
sowal.com
Let's compare MSNBC to Faux News. Faux gets a lot of crossover viewership. A lot of MSNBC enthusiasts are willing to tune in to Faux News to get their daily absurdity fix. Diehard Faux News viewers possess no similar craving for logic, reason, rationality, science, humor, you name it. Is there anything more entertaining than listening to that Doofus Ollie North take on lightweight Alan Colmes while Hannitty rudely spits out barbs and chuckles from the peanut gallery? OK so maybe Faux News does have humor.

excellent points there luc!:wave:
 

30A Skunkape

Skunky
Jan 18, 2006
10,315
2,349
55
Backatown Seagrove
Let's compare MSNBC to Faux News. Faux gets a lot of crossover viewership. A lot of MSNBC enthusiasts are willing to tune in to Faux News to get their daily absurdity fix. Diehard Faux News viewers possess no similar craving for logic, reason, rationality, science, humor, you name it. Is there anything more entertaining than listening to that Doofus Ollie North take on lightweight Alan Colmes while Hannitty rudely spits out barbs and chuckles from the peanut gallery? OK so maybe Faux News does have humor.

I actually endured (and I do mean endured) Olberman's show the last two nights. There is no need to tune in to Faux as a substantial portion of both nights consisted of the airing of Bill O'Reilly tape for character assasination purposes. I guess it is ratings envy:lol:

I had to laugh last night at the gal who was sitting in for Keith while he was otherwise occupied (I guess not playing golf) as his ratings languish in the tank. They aired a segment from a Chris Matthews Hardball episode done the night before where Chris nailed a talk radio loudmouth who was parroting a talking point about 'appeasement'. Matthews asked him to explain what Neville Chamberlain did that constituted appeasement. The radio guy clearly had no clue what Chamberlain did or did not do and he was really roasted. So of course, this dope was held up as the model of Republicans who don't really know anything but just spout off talking points. Ha, Ha. Then Olberman's substitute read some diatribe about a President being held accountable for his outrageous actions and being impeached, and just when you thought she was going to apply this to Bush, she revealed it was in regard to Andrew Jackson. My skunkape senses tingled at that as I knew Old Hickory was not impeached, but no matter, I thought I must have heard incorrectly. But lo and behold, they returned from a break (several segments later) and apologized for saying 'Jackson' when they meant 'Johnson':rotfl: So much for MSNBC's ownership of historical understanding:lol:

Here is the Chris Matthews trainwreck:
[ame="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/24673883#24673883"]msnbc.com Video Player[/ame]

Funny, I can't find the flub anywhere on MSNBC.com.:roll: But I will keep looking:D
 

LuciferSam

Banned
Apr 26, 2008
4,749
1,069
Sowal
They aired a segment from a Chris Matthews Hardball episode done the night before where Chris nailed a talk radio loudmouth who was parroting a talking point about 'appeasement'. Matthews asked him to explain what Neville Chamberlain did that constituted appeasement. The radio guy clearly had no clue what Chamberlain did or did not do and he was really roasted. So of course, this dope was held up as the model of Republicans who don't really know anything but just spout off talking points. :

After all that, a lot of Fox viewers are going to side with the dope's views even though Matthews owned him. Also, you mention the character assasination of O'reilly. What is left of his character to assassinate? I don't see how it is possible for anyone's opinion of the man to change at this point. That clip is purely for entertainment purposes.
 

Jdarg

SoWal Expert
Feb 15, 2005
18,039
1,984
After all that, a lot of Fox viewers are going to side with the dope's views even though Matthews owned him. Also, you mention the character assasination of O'reilly. What is left of his character to assassinate? I don't see how it is possible for anyone's opinion of the man to change at this point. That clip is purely for entertainment purposes.


Gem of the day.:rotfl:
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter