lol. That is a perfect representation of our lovely ga-ament.
Can someone explain bldg 7 to me?
- Thread starter sandybanks
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
- Status
The View was also used as a platform for actor James Brolin to raise 9/11 truth, who questioned the official version of events in the same week that acclaimed director David Lynch spoke out.
Lynch told Dutch television he thought WTC Building 7 was brought down via controlled demolition and that the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crash sites were suspicious due to the absence of evidence that a plane crashed at either location.
Other notable public figures speaking out at the same time included Ed Asner, Matthew Bellemy of Muse and director Richard Linklater.
American icon Willie Nelson threw his hat in the ring last month, when he told The Alex Jones Show that he thought the twin towers were imploded like condemned Las Vegas casino buildings.
Nelson's comments were almost universally blackballed by the corporate media, who had patently learned from the Sheen controversy that smear campaigns were only leading to more people being exposed to the information and beginning the wake-up process.
Of course, the really important advocates of 9/11 truth are the hundreds of architects, scholars, engineers and other expert professionals who are demanding a fresh inquiry, but they are habitually ignored by the media as the 9/11 Truth Movement is smeared as a fringe interest fad populated by kooks and imbeciles.
In reality, doubts about the official 9/11 story are shared by a myriad of well-respected figures.
The Japanese Parliament were recently a captive audience to a 9/11 truth presentation by Fujita Yukihisa - a member of the House of Councillors in the Diet.
Andreas von Buelow, the former German Defense Secretary, was perhaps the first most prominent individual to go on the record back in 2004, when he blamed the CIA for orchestrating the attacks.
He was followed by former environment minister in Tony Blair's government Michael Meacher, who questioned the stand down of NORAD on 9/11 and dismissed the entire war on terror as a hoax.
Veteran CIA agent and respected geopolitical expert Robert Baer said that "all the evidence points to" 9/11 having had elements of an inside job during a radio apperance in June 2006.
Late last year, former Italian President Francesco Cossiga told Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.
Former Wall Street Journal editor, U.S. Treasury Secretary and founder of Reaganomics Paul Craig Roberts questioned the susupicious collapse of the twin towers and Building 7 in February 2006.
Headed up by Richard Gage, the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth organization lists hundreds of experts in their field who all concur that the implosion of the buildings is not consistent with the official story and needs to be investigated.
Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice, headed by Professor Steven Jones, counts amongst its ranks hundreds of physicists, scientists and academic professionals who all share doubts about 9/11.
Another website, Patriots For 9/11 Truth, lists hundreds more former government, military, air force, and navy officials who have all spoken out about 9/11.
With the impartiality of the 9/11 Commission having been blown wide open by revelations of White House ties with Philip Zelikow, allied to the fact that the Pentagon knowingly lied to the Commission during testimony, the call for a new independent inquiry, armed with subpoena powers, is amplifying to a crescendo.
Allegations of a cover-up in regard to the organization responsible for investigating the collapse of the twin towers on behalf of FEMA this week also increased the pressure.
The more prominent figures that add their voice to that call, be they captains of culture or respected authorties in their discipline, can only increase the eventual likelihood of a new investigation.
Lynch told Dutch television he thought WTC Building 7 was brought down via controlled demolition and that the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crash sites were suspicious due to the absence of evidence that a plane crashed at either location.
Other notable public figures speaking out at the same time included Ed Asner, Matthew Bellemy of Muse and director Richard Linklater.
American icon Willie Nelson threw his hat in the ring last month, when he told The Alex Jones Show that he thought the twin towers were imploded like condemned Las Vegas casino buildings.
Nelson's comments were almost universally blackballed by the corporate media, who had patently learned from the Sheen controversy that smear campaigns were only leading to more people being exposed to the information and beginning the wake-up process.
Of course, the really important advocates of 9/11 truth are the hundreds of architects, scholars, engineers and other expert professionals who are demanding a fresh inquiry, but they are habitually ignored by the media as the 9/11 Truth Movement is smeared as a fringe interest fad populated by kooks and imbeciles.
In reality, doubts about the official 9/11 story are shared by a myriad of well-respected figures.
The Japanese Parliament were recently a captive audience to a 9/11 truth presentation by Fujita Yukihisa - a member of the House of Councillors in the Diet.
Andreas von Buelow, the former German Defense Secretary, was perhaps the first most prominent individual to go on the record back in 2004, when he blamed the CIA for orchestrating the attacks.
He was followed by former environment minister in Tony Blair's government Michael Meacher, who questioned the stand down of NORAD on 9/11 and dismissed the entire war on terror as a hoax.
Veteran CIA agent and respected geopolitical expert Robert Baer said that "all the evidence points to" 9/11 having had elements of an inside job during a radio apperance in June 2006.
Late last year, former Italian President Francesco Cossiga told Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.
Former Wall Street Journal editor, U.S. Treasury Secretary and founder of Reaganomics Paul Craig Roberts questioned the susupicious collapse of the twin towers and Building 7 in February 2006.
Headed up by Richard Gage, the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth organization lists hundreds of experts in their field who all concur that the implosion of the buildings is not consistent with the official story and needs to be investigated.
Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice, headed by Professor Steven Jones, counts amongst its ranks hundreds of physicists, scientists and academic professionals who all share doubts about 9/11.
Another website, Patriots For 9/11 Truth, lists hundreds more former government, military, air force, and navy officials who have all spoken out about 9/11.
With the impartiality of the 9/11 Commission having been blown wide open by revelations of White House ties with Philip Zelikow, allied to the fact that the Pentagon knowingly lied to the Commission during testimony, the call for a new independent inquiry, armed with subpoena powers, is amplifying to a crescendo.
Allegations of a cover-up in regard to the organization responsible for investigating the collapse of the twin towers on behalf of FEMA this week also increased the pressure.
The more prominent figures that add their voice to that call, be they captains of culture or respected authorties in their discipline, can only increase the eventual likelihood of a new investigation.
Well - now I believe! The turning point for me was when I read that Willie Nelson threw his hat in the ring!!
Shut up. You had me at Willie Nelson, you had me at Willie Nelson...
Shut up. You had me at Willie Nelson, you had me at Willie Nelson...
I hear it big time. Some of y'all need to realize that trolls aren't always evident- sometimes they cloak themselves in sweetness, sincerity, and lots of smilies. Being obviously nasty is not the only way to be disruptive to a community. I have been on this board for a looong time and my troll alarm bell has been going off a lot lately.
Saying that, SB's 9/11 conspiracy theory posts are pretty funny.
I do not know why in the world anyone posting stuff like that would be taken seriously-
I think SB wins the troll award. All of her "I had to walk the baby." "I noticed there are lots of smart people on the board, just wanted your opinion." "Go easy on me." And making friends and rep-ing people. She's really put a lot of effort and thought into it. Me thinks she/he's done it before! :roll:
Wow...I'm a believer, now. How could I have been so blind? Thank God the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth had the foresight to have Cynthia McKinney as their keynote speaker back in February.
What a moonbat she is! HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!
Krikey! If you're trying to build credibility for your group, why oh why would you have Cynthia McKinney come talk?
What a moonbat she is! HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!
Krikey! If you're trying to build credibility for your group, why oh why would you have Cynthia McKinney come talk?
Sandybanks, you'd have a lot more credibility if you would link some info other than two dozen articles from Alex Jones' website. The dude is a grade-A quack and makes a living trying to attach a conspiratorial side to everything. In life, most things ARE as they seem.
So far, you are not posting facts. You are posting opinion that is masquerading as fact. That, my friend, is dangerous.
So far, you are not posting facts. You are posting opinion that is masquerading as fact. That, my friend, is dangerous.
To all of the people on this board let me say thank you for all of your valuable comments.
Below is a link of different people who have questions about 911. Please do think I am blaming our Government. No, but I do have questions about bldg. 7 and how it fell.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf
Below is a link of different people who have questions about 911. Please do think I am blaming our Government. No, but I do have questions about bldg. 7 and how it fell.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf
While the link you provided might seem like validation on first glance it's really not. Every section starts with "The RJ Lee report says this and that", yet, all they are really doing is passing on somebody else's info. They show you some nice images that they produced, but there is no scientific validation performed to validate the report. It's basically a regurgitation of somebody else's work IMHO...
Passing on info is one thing. Gathering the same materiel and testing it for continuity of results is something totally different, altogether.
I'm waiting for that "Airplane" response. Somebody out there jump on it!
Passing on info is one thing. Gathering the same materiel and testing it for continuity of results is something totally different, altogether.
I'm waiting for that "Airplane" response. Somebody out there jump on it!
- Status