• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

Leader of the Banned

Beach Fanatic
Apr 23, 2013
4,094
6,092
I do not find it helpful to try to lump the Covid vaccine issues with the abortion issues. I can’t quite place the issues in a Venn diagram, but the overarching theme is that the radical right will try to force policies, no matter how absurd and unconstitutional to appease the only voting block they still hold sway over: the willfully uninformed. It’s not really policy. It’s Pandering 5.0.
Oh, the reason is simple. They don't care at all about abortion, the life of the unborn, or the life of anyone including themselves. They live a life of misery, and this is just one of their tantrums. They may mistakenly feel that some of their rights have been trampled on, gun rights or right to worship for example. The abortion issue is just a playing card for them. You know, if I can't have mine, then you can't have yours. They live for one thing, and that is, owning people both figuratively and literally. Seeing as the literal ownership of humans was made illegal well over a hundred years ago, life has been and always will be a frustrating ride for these folks.
 

happy2Bme

Beach Fanatic
Sep 24, 2007
879
1,243
Sowal
I rarely post here. However, the stupid is so strong with this one, I can’t help but comment. Roe v. Wade is about a woman’s right to PRIVACY. As in she has the right to privately confer with whom she decides about a non-infectious medical condition, and then has the right to privately and legally carry out treatment for said condition. Pro-choice is a misnomer, it should be pro-privacy.

To equate a non-infectious condition with a highly infectious and deadly disease is apples and oranges. You’re arguing that you have the right to publicly infect innocent people with whom you haven’t obtained the advice and consent to do so.
We aren’t equating the two medical conditions but are freedom to make choices for our personal health situation. If that’s stupid, I’ll own it. I guess all the women that are pro choice she quit saying my body my choice and start seeing my privacy, my privacy.

197376E3-3368-4CF6-AB02-813E1AB33309.jpeg
 

PoppaJ

SoWal Insider
Oct 9, 2015
8,336
20,139
We aren’t equating the two medical conditions but are freedom to make choices for our personal health situation. If that’s stupid, I’ll own it. I guess all the women that are pro choice she quit saying my body my choice and start seeing my privacy, my privacy.

View attachment 90987
Yes own it. What dumbasses like you don’t get is you have a choice. You do not have to get the vaccine if you don’t want one. No one is going to arrest you and there is no bounty being offered for your decision not to vaccinate.
 

Katie_lied

Beach Lover
May 26, 2019
61
118
Santa Rosa Beach
We aren’t equating the two medical conditions but are freedom to make choices for our personal health situation. If that’s stupid, I’ll own it. I guess all the women that are pro choice she quit saying my body my choice and start seeing my privacy, my privacy.

View attachment 90987
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11
“There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good,” read the majority opinion. “On any other basis, organized society could not exist with safety to its members. Society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy.”

The concerns for public health and safety can supersede individual rights.
 

PoppaJ

SoWal Insider
Oct 9, 2015
8,336
20,139
We aren’t equating the two medical conditions but are freedom to make choices for our personal health situation. If that’s stupid, I’ll own it. I guess all the women that are pro choice she quit saying my body my choice and start seeing my privacy, my privacy.

View attachment 90987
Neither man ever said either quote. Seems to be a habit of yours.
 

PoppaJ

SoWal Insider
Oct 9, 2015
8,336
20,139
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11
“There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good,” read the majority opinion. “On any other basis, organized society could not exist with safety to its members. Society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy.”

The concerns for public health and safety can supersede individual rights.
The origins of the Antiva movement is political and sadly the solution has to be political.
It gets tiresome forcing these Bipedal Orange Howler Monkey worshipping knuckle draggers to do what’s right.
 

Leader of the Banned

Beach Fanatic
Apr 23, 2013
4,094
6,092
Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19 Looking at deaths per age, please discuss why, other than feelings there needs to be masking of children in school.
To minimize the spread among children in school. It's not simply about deaths. Minimizing spread among everyone has many benefits. If it doesn't spread, it can't mutate for example. Children in school are just one example of a large population packed close together.
 

elgordoboy

Beach Fanatic
Feb 9, 2007
2,507
888
I no longer stay in Dune Allen
Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19 Looking at deaths per age, please discuss why, other than feelings there needs to be masking of children in school.
Only rational reason I see with the information that I have at present would be an attempt to slow the spread amongst children and subsequently the adults around them. Kids swallow loogies, pick their noses, dig in their unwiped butts etc.. they aren’t wearing and applying their masks like suggested here Can face masks protect against coronavirus? . The question might should be does a natural resistance serve everyone where a vaccinated resistance isn’t possible right now. Opening and closing classes and schools every time covid is spotted doesn’t seem remotely sane either for a variety of reasons. Logistically and educationally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter