I don't see hate or division. I see you attacking members of this forum who have stated their position, which happens to be opposed to yours. You are inciting. DO NOT FEED TROLLS PEOPLE!!!
Customary Use and Our 30A Legacy
- Thread starter Reggie Gaskins
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
Dawn,
Since you brought it up...
Logical facts and law that are not in one's favor do not equal hate.
Hate is evidenced by direct attacks with specific intended harm and pain. I'd be happy to share with you hundreds upon hundreds of screenshots full of direct hateful attacks against individuals and BPO's as a group, complete with threats, personal information including places of employment, children's names, addresses, and membership organizations. These screenshots will include physical threats. They are all public and published for all to see. They are all coming from very vocal and documented CU supporters.
I would challenge you to find even one from a BPO.
Since you brought it up...
Logical facts and law that are not in one's favor do not equal hate.
Hate is evidenced by direct attacks with specific intended harm and pain. I'd be happy to share with you hundreds upon hundreds of screenshots full of direct hateful attacks against individuals and BPO's as a group, complete with threats, personal information including places of employment, children's names, addresses, and membership organizations. These screenshots will include physical threats. They are all public and published for all to see. They are all coming from very vocal and documented CU supporters.
I would challenge you to find even one from a BPO.
Get real SIR! You just called out two members of this forum for hate. Have you no shame?
Oh, yes, the two or three individuals who have screens-shotted and blogged what they say is “evidence” of harassment and threats from CU supporters....we’ve all heard this before, this false narrative has been painted over and over again. To try to imply that somehow the more vocal leaders of Customary have individual control over others in social media or are inciting attacks as you have characterized them is completely ridiculous and untrue to the core. No vocal leaders that I know of who are Customary Use supporters have made or attacked or threatened anyone. I have seen individuals reacting to certain Social media posts with emotion and used bad language and made threatening remarks on both sides but to try to characterize the fantasy that they’re all under some sort of Svengali control is utterly ridiculous on ether side. And, regarding all this screenshot-ing that the handful of beachfront owners have done...talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Reggie, it’s becoming clearer and clearer who you might be...more crumbs than a New York deli.
Last edited:
Walton County is in Court because the old BCC tried to TAKE constitutional property rights from legally deeded private property owners OUTSIDE of the judicial system. Taking property rights outside of a judicial ruling would be in court with or without HB 631. The court process would be more complicated and cost more without HB 631, but the reason it is in court is solely because the BCC attempted for the first time in Walton County History to TAKE property rights way from a targeted group of citizens.
Interesting that the targeted group of citizens have been vilified on social media (facebook and twitter) by one of the Plaintiff Attorney groups in this lawsuit. This is also a first for Walton County (possibly the State of Florida).
The vote by the old BCC to sue private property owners was under the guidelines that it was ANCIENT, REASONABLE, WITHOUT INTERUPTION, AND FREE FROM DISPUTE in a rush after the BCC election but before the new BCC took office and the BCC was told by the activists "not more than a dozen BPO's will object". The activists have certainly established this is anything but free from dispute...
And you are correct, CU was made a platform issue and Bill F. was thrown under the bus because he would not say "Sue the BPO's not matter what it costs the tax payers of Walton County" and publicly declare "No Compromise" or risk defeat. So yes the "CU Ultimatum with No Compromise" was a rally cry and the man who has done more for Walton County lost. Sad day for Walton County.
The whole issue has never been about Customary Use or Beach Access. It is about Corporate Use and Corporate Access.
Public beach access has always been available in ample supply - but not always on the "front row". And that seems to be the rub for a lot of people that come to the water. You can't blame them for wanting an unobstructed view of the water, but they do not have that right on someone else's property. And the BFO's have the right, and the responsibility, to control what happens on their land. Liability falls solely on the property owner and, as such, the right to maintain and control belongs to said owner.
Public beach access has always been available in ample supply - but not always on the "front row". And that seems to be the rub for a lot of people that come to the water. You can't blame them for wanting an unobstructed view of the water, but they do not have that right on someone else's property. And the BFO's have the right, and the responsibility, to control what happens on their land. Liability falls solely on the property owner and, as such, the right to maintain and control belongs to said owner.
Not sure what you're talking about. I'm not from New York, and I don't hang out in Deli's. I'll only eat bread if it's gluten free, fewer crumbs.
Quit trying to play detective, and address the problems with lawyers, and wealthy business owners running FBFA. How can that elite class of rule and LAW breakers attack the common citizens and then blame them for the fight y'all started? Asking for a friend.
Anyone who claims to know who Reggie's is like someone bluffing with a pair of 10's on a Sunday night.
Most importantly, what does it matter? Let's get back to the issues. So far Walton County has spent over a millions dollars and more at risk in the attempt to TAKE property rights against the US Constitution and the Florida Property Bill of Rights.
Do you think the US Supreme Court is going to side with the BCC TAKING Property Rights?
Let's spend some time cleaning up the Vendor Beach Chair issue and protecting our unique ecosystem.
Most importantly, what does it matter? Let's get back to the issues. So far Walton County has spent over a millions dollars and more at risk in the attempt to TAKE property rights against the US Constitution and the Florida Property Bill of Rights.
Do you think the US Supreme Court is going to side with the BCC TAKING Property Rights?
Let's spend some time cleaning up the Vendor Beach Chair issue and protecting our unique ecosystem.