FBB, do you believe that the Framers of our Constitution could see into the future?
Not relevant question but I’ll bite - do you? Observation, you have your own interesting progressive interpretation of the Constitution; and have often mistakenly mixed quotes from the Declaration of Independence with the Constitution or Bill of Rights. Just be more careful.
There are seven Articles of the Constitution and 27 Amendments. The first 10 Amendments in 1791 make up the Bill of Rights to protected and strengthen Individual Constitutions rights - not “the public’s” rights. The Fifth Amendment states; “No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
Bill of Rights - Bill of Rights Institute
The 1841 14th Amendment states; “nor shall any State [or a County subdivision of the State] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
An person’s right to life, liberty, or property, without due process of law is the only individual right stated twice in the Constitution. That’s a fact; not me speaking for the Founders.
Interesting that the last 27th Amendment was passed September 25, 1789 but was not ratified until May 7, 1992. Only took Congress 203 years in the future to prevent granting themselves pay raises during the course of a legislative session.
Do you think they [the Founders] would be okay with how you hide behind a fake name and speak for them?
Where have I spoken for the Founders? Not credible statement. The Founders during the debates over the design and ratification of the United States Constitution, in 1787 and 1788, a large number of writers in the popular press used pseudonyms. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay used the pseudonym “Publius” and wrote the 85 Federalist Papers.
Alexander Hamilton used the pseudonym “Phocion”.
List of pseudonyms used in the American Constitutional debates - Wikipedia
The Anti-Federalist Papers authors used pseudonyms as well. Cato (likely George Clinton), Brutus (likely Melancton Smith or Robert Yates or perhaps John Williams), Centinel (Samuel Bryan), and the Federal Farmer (either Melancton Smith, Richard Henry Lee, or Mercy Otis Warren.
Ben Franklin wrote under many pseudonyms and is best know as Richard Sanders and "Poor Richard" of Poor Richard's Almanac. Poor Richard said; "Half wits talk much but say little [or show silly images]." Does it change the meaning that Poor Richard wrote that instead of Ben Franklin? I may not be Ben Franklin; but Ben did not own beachfront in Walton County. Even if Ben did, public CU use of private property would not have been “ancient” use by Blackstone old English common law standards. Or tell us why it would be ancient use.
Do you think that they would not have a problem with concentrated power of a few that limits LLH for We The People?
Interesting interpretation of the Declaration of Independence. If you mean do I think the authors of the Constitution would have a problem with persons (individuals) having Constitutionally protected property rights (power) to own private property, that include private uninterrupted (quiet) use and enjoyment, that can not be “taken” by Government for public use and not compensate the owner for the take? No, I don’t think the Founders would have a problem with that property right since it is in the Constitutional Amendments - twice.
You are trying to label those of us who simply believe in public beaches for future generations into something that is just not the truth.
Your words not mine. Do you believe in the Rule of Law? Stop putting your words in my and BFO’s mouths. No credibility. What basis do you believe your truth? Opinions and feelings are not a good basis of labeling those that followed the law, have legal title to property, and pay taxes on their property, to unilaterally apply your or a partisan poll’s different belief. Not how the world works in the USA. Or amend the US Constitution.
I love my Country and I have as much admiration for the framers of our GREAT CONSTITUTION as you do!
Then read it, study it, and understand it. Read SCOTUS, the final judges of Constitution law, rulings too. Take the time to understand what you post before you post it. Be more careful.
If you would just stop speaking for other people and speak for yourself (but you must have an identity to do that) it would be a decent conversation of the problems that exist on Walton County Beaches.
Keep repeating and beating the pseudonym dead horse. Given your alternative class warfare conspiracy world view I’m not too concerned if you believe my facts or opinions or not.
CU believe what they want to believe; regardless of the facts or law, or who posts them. I post facts, law, and verifiable opinions to inform BFOs; not CU “believers”; who can not explain what basis you believe the CU agenda, other than it emotionally feels “right”. Want a conversation with a “real” BFO? Email James Lince. Email is well known or ask Rauschkolb for it. Discuss “ancient” public use of private property. Ancient is the first, but not only, CU criteria. Can you define “the People’s” old English or American “ancient” customary use criteria? 50 years like Commissioner Tony Anderson has proclaimed? 100 years? Time whereof the memory of man runs not to the contrary? Time immemorial? How about US courts? #79
Customary Use and Our 30A Legacy]
I really like to learn things I do not know but you believe that everything in LIFE exists around one principle.
Wrong again. Your opinion not mine. Stop putting your words in my and BFOs mouths.
I know you must be aware of the fact that LLH for We The People ensures a more perfect union.
Show us where you got that Declaration of Independence fact, other than your own opinion.
I don't really believe that you care much about Walton County BFO's.
Wrong again. Getting old repeating this. Your baseless opinion not mine. Stop putting your words in my and BFOs mouths.
We can have a decent and civil conversation but you should start speaking for yourself with an identity. Both you and Regina.
Repetitive, not relevant, and not credible reply to the previous CU civil conversation questions already asked or to the Commissioners’ multi-million dollar CU litigation. Besides CU believers would not believe any facts I or any BFO posts, and I would not have to worry about fake police report, attorney staging trespass on my property, or all the “kind” misinformed antisocial medial posts. CUnCourt as the Defendant in Walton Commissioner’s CU litigation.
