I follow a few pages that have to do with with making our area better. Many folks say you have to engage in the process, emails, talking to those who make decisions, showing up at meetings. Folks complain emails aren't returned, access to meeting are hindered because of the time of day and access to decision makers is difficult. I wonder if we have anyone in all these groups who agree on everything. We have people who want to limit/ stop development because of infrastructure issues. We have folks who own property who want to build on their property. So we have competition for what should be allowed and not allowed.
The answer to much of this is Politics. But even local politicians are limited to what they can do based on limits that were put in place by previous Politicians or by legal precedent or even State intervention.
The way to make change is to become involved. Either via email, or making time to visit with those decision makers or stepping out and running for office or being appointed to some of the committees. We can't be discouraged by obstacles that seem to occur. We can't be afraid to put ourselves in the middle of the politics that is Walton County. We have to be involved. If you don't like the representation you have, then you have to either run or find someone who will run and support them. What I find in my conversations with people and my reading here locally is that it is very easy to complain until you have to put skin in the game. Elections occur every 2 year, redistricting every 10 years.
One of the things I have recently noticed folks have some strong thoughts about the Planning Commission. I was recently told/ read about how folks feel these people just rubber stamp items on their agenda. That this commission doesn't take into consideration the thoughts or impacts these projects have on the community/areas. I would venture to guess there is someone who is employed by the County who sits in on these meetings who is versed on what the codes and rules are. It may be a lawyer. I would also venture the developer or someone in his employ is also sitting presenting the why they should be allowed to do what they believe they are allowed to do. In the end is seem to go to the Planning Board members for the final say. Either way, whether it is approved or disapproved someone won't be happy. It seems those appointed to these positions should be looking out not for the interest of the people or the developer but the rules that have been set forth in the codes and zoning established by the county. The Solar Farm is kind of an example for me. If I remember correctly, the Planning Commission approved the plan over the objections of the residents. The BCC turned around and denied it and was basically fixing to be sued. After all that something happened in Tallahassee (Preemption of Local Decision) occurred and even before it was signed by the Governor the County was back at the table negotiating with Gulf Power. Personally, not sure what the Legislature did would have made a difference in the Walton County case, but could/ will have a profound impact going forward.
The answer to much of this is Politics. But even local politicians are limited to what they can do based on limits that were put in place by previous Politicians or by legal precedent or even State intervention.
The way to make change is to become involved. Either via email, or making time to visit with those decision makers or stepping out and running for office or being appointed to some of the committees. We can't be discouraged by obstacles that seem to occur. We can't be afraid to put ourselves in the middle of the politics that is Walton County. We have to be involved. If you don't like the representation you have, then you have to either run or find someone who will run and support them. What I find in my conversations with people and my reading here locally is that it is very easy to complain until you have to put skin in the game. Elections occur every 2 year, redistricting every 10 years.
One of the things I have recently noticed folks have some strong thoughts about the Planning Commission. I was recently told/ read about how folks feel these people just rubber stamp items on their agenda. That this commission doesn't take into consideration the thoughts or impacts these projects have on the community/areas. I would venture to guess there is someone who is employed by the County who sits in on these meetings who is versed on what the codes and rules are. It may be a lawyer. I would also venture the developer or someone in his employ is also sitting presenting the why they should be allowed to do what they believe they are allowed to do. In the end is seem to go to the Planning Board members for the final say. Either way, whether it is approved or disapproved someone won't be happy. It seems those appointed to these positions should be looking out not for the interest of the people or the developer but the rules that have been set forth in the codes and zoning established by the county. The Solar Farm is kind of an example for me. If I remember correctly, the Planning Commission approved the plan over the objections of the residents. The BCC turned around and denied it and was basically fixing to be sued. After all that something happened in Tallahassee (Preemption of Local Decision) occurred and even before it was signed by the Governor the County was back at the table negotiating with Gulf Power. Personally, not sure what the Legislature did would have made a difference in the Walton County case, but could/ will have a profound impact going forward.