The point is not whether it is private beach access the point is whether a residential preservation lot is used for a bathroom facility building and golf cart parking rather than a single family lot. It's not whether the developer of Rosemary Beach did it or not it is whether it was done and a precedent. That's what everybody has seemed to be worried about that slippery slope that if Redfish can do it now then what happens for everybody else. Well Redfish is Infill what I don't understand which I hope somebody can answer is how can they have this a bathroom facility for their beach goers and golf cart parking on a residential preservation lot.
Vagrant your attempt to try to get people all pumped up because you say somebody advertised something early is pathetic (to use your words). The letter I have told you about makes your entire case ridiculous. I never thought I would see this but you are almost as goofy as Edroedrog, who by the way is so far gone I don't even understand what he is saying.
Let's be clear about something Vagrant. You have never said one thing which proves anybody advertised anything improperly. If you do then post it. And don't rely on the article in the Walton Sun which everybody in Walton County knows was biased and one-sided. I am calling you out and asking you, tell us exactly what you know about somebody advertising illegally and "playing by their rules". If you can't do that with facts then you should log off.
DISCLAIMER:
Oral representations cannot be relied upon as correctly stating representations of the developer. For correct representations, make reference to this web site and to the documents required by section 718,503, Florida Statues, to be furnished by a developer to a buyer or lessee. Redfish Village is proposed and need not be built.
