This is sad. I have taken many guests there over the years. We patronize the restaurants, walk around, even over to the walkovers, admire the beach, take some photos, and leave things the way we found them (if not better-I try to pick up litter when I see it because it ticks me off). My family thought about taking some international inlaws there last year but I was really disheartened and embarrassed by the possibility of being asked to leave. My family is from Walton county -I want to share places with them where they will feel welcome. We would never dream of invading someone's privacy or parking in front of their homes (or rentals - we have family reunions at the beach, too). After "meeting" some of you online that work or live there who seem like really great people; I can imagine this must be even more frustrating to you.
30-A is a public road, right? Even after reading this entire thread, I am still a bit confused about what Seaside residents pay for, and what all taxpayers are paying for. I'm not trying to be patronizing - I truly just want to understand; isn't Seaside supposed to be a neo-urbanist "town" (with its own post office and everything)? Aren't town and city parks, gazebos, sidewalks, etc, usually open to the public? Does the fact that much of the town of Seaside is made up of rentals change this perception? I had also heard that initially Seaside was not initially supposed to build on the southern side of 30A? Could the fact that they did have fueled some of the territorial debate?
Anyway, just a train of thought...
As for strictly enjoying the beach, we now generally go to Grayton State Park, pay the fees, no worries. It has always been my favorite beach locale anyway (besides Blue Mountain - but now I'm worried about stepping onto the wrong piece of sand there).
DPZ is building a new "community" in Galveston, TX, not too far from where I currently reside. It will be interesting to see how they address similar issues.