this is another one of those media generated issues IMO. It is easier to ask this and start a whole whirlwind of speculation than to do the hard work of reporting.
IMO We would be better off hearing about some of the real issues that I hope someone is taking care of...and I would prefer the reporters ask the president about the issues, rather than whether he is going to get angry or vacation on the Gulf coast.
I would like to hear a discussion about what he is doing to galvanize resources to stop this disaster; to get people to clean this up; maybe to find a tanker that is closer than Newfoundland and could get to the Gulf in less than two weeks FTLOG!
Except for Rolling Stone and McClatchy reporters, who has looked into why MMS wasn't swept clean?
.why there isn't a Task Force in the White House on this disaster?
why there wasn't a conference between maybe our Secretary of Commerce and State Department and their counterparts in the UK to see how to galvanize resources to come to the aid of the British company that is so obviously incompetent to fix this thing?
where are the clean up people? Why is there so much confusion about the boom?
Why did the EPA authorize the dispersant?
The list of questions is endless...and we have reporters and anchors who make millions of dollars
asking about vacation plans and anger!
hold the president and the administration accountable, but hold them accountable for something that matters...