Herald-Breeze article
For anyone who didn't see last Thursday's Herald-Breeze, here is the article I referred to in my original post, copied and posted here with permission from the editor/publisher Ron Kelley. IMHO, The Herald-Breeze is the best, most consistent and reliable source for news of local gov't goings-on. Only costs about $20 a year to subscribe and it's in my mailbox every Wednesday by noon.
The "land-use based zoning" Stratmann mentions is, I believe, what planners refer to as Euclidian zoning, apparently regarded as an obsolete and unworkable methodology now for all kinds of reasons including the fact that it actually encourages sprawl and all its concommitant ills.
FLU elements of EAR gain conceptual approval
By LEAH STRATMANN
The Beach Breeze
After eight public workshops to discuss future land use (FLU) elements of the evaluation and appraisal report (EAR) mandated by the state, the planning commission finally granted conceptual approval, pending a report on one small section by county attorney Mike Burke.
The murky issue concerns the category known as neighborhood commercial (NC) in south Walton, permitting limited commercial uses in close proximity to residential areas. The question concerns which properties were designated either by covenant, the county, or deed restrictions prior to November 1996 as commercial. Burke was asked to investigate this particular issue and provide guidance. As he was not at last week?s workshop, the commission voted to accept the rest of the document, pending his report.
Planning department Lois Le Seur, the chief architect of the FLU section of the EAR, came equipped with a laptop to correct errors or make changes in text according to the vote of the planning commission. She said, ?We have done our best to roll in everything we can roll into this document. I hope the only thing left is cleanup.?
Before the document was accepted, commissioner Susan Horn suggested some additional language be added to the document. ?I would like to have some language in the document saying the county intends to move toward transect-based planning in the future, even if it isn?t possible to redo this document right now. Transect planning handles the compatibility issue. I think we can do better than this, and I?d like to get that in the works now.?
Le Seur said, ?We already have inherent in our plan a lot of transect concepts and I think we have incorporated as much as we can. If we are to do more, we have to do so at the direction of the county.?
Transect-based coding or smart zoning is a system that organizes land in a gradient from the most natural/rural to the most urban. Transect replaces traditional land-use based zoning. Land-use zoning segregates land uses and is an auto-dependent system which together form what is commonly known as sprawl.
The transect system was introduced to the commissioners by a group of citizens in late December who came together with a visioning plan for Walton County.
Commission chairman Tom Terrell said, ?Some of the items presented by the visioning group are workable in certain areas, but the commission did not agree with the entire concept. Since we have to go through this process again in seven years, smart zoning or the transect concept may be the desire of the Board of County Commissioners (BCC).
Commissioner Randy Gardner said, ?I don?t think we can say today how we should go forward in seven years. I?m comfortable with the way the document is written.?
Terrell said, ?I would like to thank the planning department for the time and effort they have put in on this. From my reading of this, it looks like we have ridden this horse as far as we can ride it. We have had eight meetings on this, plus a lot of individual meetings between the public and planning department members.?
Citizen Marsha Weingartner addressed the commission saying, ?I just want to protect agricultural areas. I think it is a travesty to put into law that you can have one house per acre in the agriculture category. I want lower density in the neighborhood. You have a person build a house in an agriculture region and then they want all the benefits of the city and want to complain about the agricultural operations nearby,? she said.
Bill Bard said, ?The first word in your name is planning. I think this document is where we should start to move forward with smart zoning for the future. If we wait seven years for the next commission and they decide to wait, we get further and further behind. This body is reactive rather than proactive. I think Commissioner Horn got steamrolled on this.?
South Walton Community Council executive director Anita Page chimed in saying, ?I would like to see a workshop or something where people can learn more about transect zoning so Walton County does not get further and further behind other communities who are using this to good effect.?
Terrell suggested those opinions should be brought to the BCC. ?There is no steamrolling or stonewalling, all we are doing is expressing our opinion. The BCC would be the more proactive body. Convince the BCC to get involved and more educated. I don?t think anybody on the planning commission had a problem with what was presented.?
Commission Tom Patton said, ?Susan?s idea has some merit. If we put it in there, it goes to the BCC.?
Gardner disagreed saying, ?The document we are trying to create is a working document. If there is a separate motion to be passed onto the BCC concerning transect zoning, it does not affect this working document. We can suggest the issue be explored and addressed.?
Terrell agreed, suggesting a recommendation to the BCC to establish a series of workshops. In the end Commissioner Horn made the a motion for the planning commission to direct the BCC to direct the planning department to explore a transect-based approach for Walton County as a whole for the possibility of inclusion in the land development code (LDC) as well as incorporation of the comprehensive plan for the next round of EAR-based amendments.
The motion was seconded by Patton and passed by all.
Once conceptual approval had been given to the FLU document, the group moved on to the 19-page glossary of terms used within the document. Planning director Pat Blackshear noted, ?It is a work in progress that we had to make consistent with state and federal rules. This is a first draft. Where you see a definition, they will all be consistent with state law. Most of the more technical terms will be found in the LDC. It is a judgment on our part which ones go to which document.?
The commissioners and the public then starting reading the glossary and going page by page to clarify it according to suggestions by the commission and the public. The changes to the FLU document as well as the glossary can be downloaded or viewed on the county?s Website.
The next meeting of the planning commission on Feb. 12 will start two hours early to further explore the glossary. The FLU element is the first of ten sections that must be addressed in the EAR.