Its hard to take allegations of insurrection and sedition serious when NO ONE has been charged with them but that won't stop some people with a narrative to push. At it's worst you could say Jan 6th was a conspiracy since 1 person (out of the thousands in attendance) was alleged to have committed that crime (might be best to wait and see if they are convicted). Right now it looks like most of Jan 6th incident was a demonstration that included some parading and picketing (judging by the guilty pleas). Breath before you comment pleaseIn your humorous example it's an impossible case to make. In the Jan 6 insurrection, it's an extremely difficult one, at least historically. It's so difficult, that even attempting it may not be worth the trouble. Fortunately for our country's sake, there is very little legal precedent. These things don't happen very often. Still, legal scholars leave it on the table.
Are Jan. 6 rioters traitors? So far, criminal charges say no
At least one man is charged with conspiracy. It should be clear that the nature of the crimes committed at the insurrection are a far cry from statue toppling. It was an attempt to interfere with our most important governmental function. To use the word "insurrection" is not hyperbole, simply because prosecutors were reluctant to bring charges of sedition or treason.
