BMBV I have seen your educated and great responses on this issue for the past 6 months or so and commend you for your input, but this issue is one that we can not get tired of.
Thanks.
Again, I should have been speaking for myself as I stated in a previous post.
OK, I'm a bit confused here. Regarding walls on public property (another thread BTW) I thought they were talking about the homes on the west end of Montgomery Street with GeoTubes. The "County Official" that you refer to, doesn't install these (as far as I know). However there may be more wood walls on public property where he did. I'm not sure.Maybe that was the intent of the County Official that built the walls in the first place, build them, hide from the fight, and wait long enough for everyone to tire out and let it die.
Are you talking about building walls on public property or walls in general? I assume it's about building private walls on public beaches.The people of this community can and will not allow this to happen.
This has already been discussed at length and is obviously not a simple situation. It won't be resolved here.While I feel for you and other beach front owners, the fact remains all of you know what you are living on, an eroding shoreline that has a backyard that is not owned by you. The seawalls are a detriment to this area and the facts are positive to this.
By the way, the "backyard" that you refer to IS legally owned by our association as is all the properties in our general area. This is in contrast to the situation on Montgomery Street. Technically and legally speaking (from what I understand and please correct me if I'm wrong), Blue Mountain Beach is private for the most part. But that's a whole different issue. I'm sure someone's hair is standing straight up on their neck right now.
Food for Thought: If the general public treats the gulf front owners located at Montgomery Street with such disdain, would it be unreasonable for other gulf front property owners who own to the waterline to treat the general public the same way when the public uses "their property"?
I'm not looking for an answer, PLEASE. Just think about it. I know this will only generate a heated debate where nobody wins. Life is about compromise (so is marriage but I'm still working on that part
Again I think you're referring to the Montgomery Street situation. When I first heard about this, I questioned the thread starter (a few months ago)about how far they were past their property lines. I didn't hear back. I assumed (and hoped) it was just a foot or two...an understandable mistake. But it seems to be much worse than that.The BCC, the State, and the Feds all should be ashamed for allowing this but the beach front owners who claim they did not know they were doing anything wrong should be the real ones ashamed.
Now that I think about it, I remember making a comment on one of the old threads regarding GeoTubes (which I believe were used here). That is, the higher you have to stack the tubes, the further out on the beach one has to go with the base (pyramid effect). GeoTubes are a "feel good" solution because it's made from fabric and sand and therefore gves the appearance that it does not "intrude" upon the beach system as much as traditional sheet pile.
This might explain why they had to go so far out into the beach. Again, in my opinion, they should have gone with a sheet type of retaining wall which results in minimal disruption beyond the wall (besides possible increased erosion which is everyone's concern including mine).
This from an engineering report from PBS&J for Florida DEP (I posted this way back when)....
"Qualitative evidence confirms the company/product claim that the ProTecTube III system is not designed to protect against hurricanes and did not abate erosion caused by Hurricane Ivan. An aerial photograph from the FDEP shows a similar erosional pattern of the adjacent, un-protected beaches"
BTW, these homes have been here since the 1950s (I believe). I won't sit and judge their "survival" situation from the luxury of my comfortable office chair. I've got my own situation to deal with.
I'd take your concern for this public property issue to the following threads...
[ame="http://www.sowal.com/bb/showthread.php?t=8456"]Seawalls Built on Public Beach - SoWal Beaches Forum[/ame]
[ame="http://www.sowal.com/bb/showthread.php?t=8568"]Seawall Decision in Today's Paper - SoWal Beaches Forum[/ame]
Are you referring to some walkovers that were damaged by the storm the past week when you say "today"? I'm not sure what you're really asking here. The county did most of the cleaning last year.My question to you is, Who is going to pick up all the wood with nails and other hazards that are on our beaches today? Last year it was a group of surfers that went up and down the beaches and in and out of the water picking up the objects, were any home owners doing the same?
Thanks to all the surfers for helping out, sincerely. Rememeber they were probably pulling out all kinds of stuff... private walkovers, retaining walls and PUBLIC walkovers. Did you happen to see any county commissioners swimming in and out picking up all that TREX used in public walkovers? ;-) By the way, does TREX float?
And, yes, I have picked up trash in front of our property. Next time, I'll bring my snorkel gear.
Luckily, Aaron Lewis, of Construction and Such did a fantastic job of installing our walkover this year. All the forward posts were installed several feet down. No damage this time. He definitely earned this plug. Sorry, I digress.