misleading title
They also endorsed Michael Dukakis in 1988 and Clinton in 92 and 96. Very conservative.
Earlier in the day it was posted that I posted a misleading title regarding Obama and Sex Ed to 5 year olds. If you take a look at the thread is asked: Does Obama Really support Sex Ed for Kinders? Not a statement. Then I quote an article that basically says the law asks for age-appropriate comphrehensive sex education for K-12. Factcheck.org also states this wording of the law. They go on to defend Obama that he did not intend for it to mean teaching sex eds to 5 year olds and he is on the record as not supporting sex ed to 5 year olds, but the law he did support is not clear on that. So while misleading, McCains ad was not as outrageous of a lie as Obama telling old ladies that if the McCain-Bush social security privatization plan had passed that her money would have been jeopardized this week.
They also endorsed Michael Dukakis in 1988 and Clinton in 92 and 96. Very conservative.

Earlier in the day it was posted that I posted a misleading title regarding Obama and Sex Ed to 5 year olds. If you take a look at the thread is asked: Does Obama Really support Sex Ed for Kinders? Not a statement. Then I quote an article that basically says the law asks for age-appropriate comphrehensive sex education for K-12. Factcheck.org also states this wording of the law. They go on to defend Obama that he did not intend for it to mean teaching sex eds to 5 year olds and he is on the record as not supporting sex ed to 5 year olds, but the law he did support is not clear on that. So while misleading, McCains ad was not as outrageous of a lie as Obama telling old ladies that if the McCain-Bush social security privatization plan had passed that her money would have been jeopardized this week.
I'll have to spend more time there.
