• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Abby Prentiss

Beach Fanatic
May 17, 2007
577
123
After looking at photos of Rosie the riveter during WWII I was wondering - was Hitler good for women's rights? Did he do more for us than any other single person by sending us into the factories? Getting women out of the home and killing so many American men sure did change America. Then couple that with all of the post-war changes and Hitler may be responsible for the way we are today more than Jesus or Reagan or Einstein. Thoughts?
 

Alicia Leonard

SoWal Insider
After looking at photos of Rosie the riveter during WWII I was wondering - was Hitler good for women's rights? Did he do more for us than any other single person by sending us into the factories? Getting women out of the home and killing so many American men sure did change America. Then couple that with all of the post-war changes and Hitler may be responsible for the way we are today more than Jesus or Reagan or Einstein. Thoughts?


The girls didn't want to go back home after they saved the country and I would agree that it was a major turning point in the way we live. If people actually followed Jesus teachings then that would be a major change too, but few actually do what he says and prefer to stick with the old testament as their personal behavior guide, imho. Einstein's theories may be changed as out science grows.
 

beachmouse

Beach Fanatic
Dec 5, 2004
3,499
741
Bluewater Bay, FL
An online friend did her PhD dissertation on women, work, and WW2, and her conclusion was that, despite what we'd hope to find, the majority of women were glad to move back into homemaking roles after the war and weren't particularly upset to be displaced by men returning home to work at their old jobs.

While there were obviously going to be exceptions to the rule, and I know I would have been really unhappy in 1950s suburbia, the Ozzie and Harriet family suburban structure in the 1950s was actually a pretty comfortable arrangement for the (usually white) families that lived it, especially compared to the pre-war 1930s when the country was still trying to pull itself out of the Great Depression.

But I wonder if the relative comfort of post-WW2 suburbia was what actually gave people enough breathing room for large numbers of people to step back, move up a couple steps on Maslov's hierarchy of needs, and start to think a little bit deeper about themselves and how they wanted society to be, and that played into both the Civil Rights movement and more equal opportunity for women.
 

Jdarg

SoWal Expert
Feb 15, 2005
18,039
1,984
yes, and its all completely meaningless. you can't put any of us into such narrowly ridiculous categories - we are so much MORE than Democrat or Republican or whatever label you choose... however, the problem with it, even when its meant as a joke, is that people take it seriously and use such crap to build themselves up so they can feel superior to someone else. who, I don't know. at least they can feel good for a moment sitting in front of their computer feeling superior.

the question on the first part of this "email" is this:
Which side of the fence?
If you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!


in my experience and opinion, the answer is - if you sit on either side of the poorly & narrowly written referenced fence, you are a dumbass.

Oh Toots thanks for the laugh. And something seems a bit too familiar about ol' Edgy Grammy......:lol:
 

Abby Prentiss

Beach Fanatic
May 17, 2007
577
123
An online friend did her PhD dissertation on women, work, and WW2, and her conclusion was that, despite what we'd hope to find, the majority of women were glad to move back into homemaking roles after the war and weren't particularly upset to be displaced by men returning home to work at their old jobs.

While there were obviously going to be exceptions to the rule, and I know I would have been really unhappy in 1950s suburbia, the Ozzie and Harriet family suburban structure in the 1950s was actually a pretty comfortable arrangement for the (usually white) families that lived it, especially compared to the pre-war 1930s when the country was still trying to pull itself out of the Great Depression.

But I wonder if the relative comfort of post-WW2 suburbia was what actually gave people enough breathing room for large numbers of people to step back, move up a couple steps on Maslov's hierarchy of needs, and start to think a little bit deeper about themselves and how they wanted society to be, and that played into both the Civil Rights movement and more equal opportunity for women.

Good post - I always assumed 40s gals saw a bit of the outside world and wanted more. Maybe some did. From what I've read the fifties were plenty weird. On one hand you thought you might get blown up any second. That tends to mess with your head. On the other hand people had wealth and time and modern conveniences. A perfect cocktail for getting spoiled and bored and restless.

Then came drugs and birth control and the rest is herstory.
 

Lynnie

SoWal Insider
Apr 18, 2007
8,151
434
SoBuc
I suspected a few days ago, Grammy isn't who she says she is, but I have no idea who she is? Who are Y'all thinking?
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter