interesting historical observations buzz. what do you think on a go forward basis though? Are they really out of the good stuff? Bears on JOE are valuing their land at around 3 or 4K per acre. If there are any remaining acres around Watercolor, or Watersound, where there are about 6 lots per acre, I'd like to buy an acre for 100K, if I could - that would represent 5 or 6 lots at 17-20K a pop. It also represents acreage at THAT low price, that is about 3300% higher than the bearish analyst from New York City puts on the "redneck riviera". I think it is has been a serious mistake for Einhorn, but I'm guessing he's changed his mind already, although I sincerely hope he lets his ego get in the way, and doubles down. Anything you like here Buzz?
Did I mention I also like Regions FInancial at this point.
Still haven't gotten your valuation methodology. Sounds to me like you bought in way too high and are hoping upon all hope that the stock makes an unlikely, short term return to where you bought in so you can dump and run.
In terms of your analysis above, you completely forgot to take into consideration the huge amount of infrastructure cost to develop the land. If you bought some of that acreage at $100k per acre you would likely lose money after putting in the necessary infrastructure to develop the land BEFORE you could actually sell lots.
Remember, most of JOEs land is swamp or near swamp land. There are hundreds of thousands of similar swamp land along the coast of Ms, La, Al, and other areas of Fl south of Walton County. It will be a long, long, long time, if ever, before any of this land will have any appreciable value. The limited number of near ocean acreage has some value but the rest of it is only worth the value of the timber. The can't give away already developed lots in very near ocean locations such as The Preserve, Cypress Dunes, Cypress Breeze, etc. What makes you think the swamp land much farther from the beach will sell for more than the lots in these near ocean developments.
Regarding the short term run up--the greater fool and short term trading theories are at work here. The Company is not worth any more than $1 billion, if that. And, I am talking about REAL underlying value--in other words, the how much investors will ULTIMATELY get in cash from there investments, not what traders buy and sell at day to day based on the latest way in which the wind blows.
Please post your valuation methodology that supports your ultimate valuation of the company. Until that time, your words are not credible. They are the words of a day trader hoping for a quick fix.
Good luck if you are truly buying and holding for 50 years which is the advice you gave everyone (which I seriously doubt).