BAIPA - sleeper issue?

[Mango]

Your argument is that late term elective abortions should be legal because they are rare, right? Help me out here. I just want to be clear before I say that dairy cattle could make better arguments.

I know you all will PM each other that I'm talking to myself here, but when a counter argument sticks, it tends to go quiet. It's pretty damned telling that scooterbug, bdarg, jdarg, and rapunzel give radio silence when I ask if they are against late term elective abortions. Not even a response with caveats. It's shameful and disgusting. Third trimester elective abortions, used as a form of birth control, no matter how rare, should make your stomach turn.

Well bow your head and say moo, 6th because Roe vs. Wade gave the State the right to step in and deny a woman the right to terminate her pregnancy for any reason, after viability and in the third trimester, in a clear and unequivocal support of protecting fetal life, with the only exception being the protection of a woman's health or life.

I pray to God that you and you wife are never in a position where you have to make a decision, after viability, between choosing between her or the baby, and risk losing both, because what constitutes "viability" is even a grey area.

 

[6thGen]

Well bow your head and say moo, 6th because Roe vs. Wade gave the State the right to step in and deny a woman the right to terminate her pregnancy for any reason, after viability and in the third trimester, in a clear and unequivocal support of protecting fetal life, with the only exception being the protection of a woman's health or life.

I pray to God that you and you wife are never in a position where you have to make a decision, after viability, between choosing between her or the baby, and risk losing both, because what constitutes "viability" is even a grey area.

Is there some glitch here where everyone is missing "elective"? I recognize that states can place restrictions, I'm asking the aforementioned if they support them.

 

[Jdarg]

Well bow your head and say moo, 6th because Roe vs. Wade gave the State the right to step in and deny a woman the right to terminate her pregnancy for any reason, after viability and in the third trimester, in a clear and unequivocal support of protecting fetal life, with the only exception being the protection of a woman's health or life.

I pray to God that you and you wife are never in a position where you have to make a decision, after viability, between choosing between her or the baby, and risk losing both, because what constitutes "viability" is even a grey area.

Thank you Mango.

 

[Jdarg]

Is there some glitch here where everyone is missing "elective"? I recognize that states can place restrictions, I'm asking the aforementioned if they support them.

I do not support any ban or restriction on any reproduction-related procedure, including late term abortion. All of these decisions are between a woman and her doctor, period. Is that specific enough for you? Please don't be one of those crazies that stalk people that are pro-choice.

 

[Jdarg]

Not to split hairs, but it went silent when I asked if they'd consent to a ban on late term elective abortions. No one really wants to answer that question. The closest I got was it was rare and therefore unnecessary. I can name a few other things that are rare that result in jail time.

And the ignore button now goes on! Ding!

 

[6thGen]

Is this going to hurt my chances for prom king at next year's Seaside Prom? Dammit, Mother warned me about discussing politics and religion.

 

[Jdarg]

Dang it- forgot to activate the button.

6th Gen, your last comment could be construed as pretty creepy and scary. I usually refrain from engaging with you, because it just gets too weird and pointless.

 

[Bdarg]

Is there some glitch here where everyone is missing "elective"? I recognize that states can place restrictions, I'm asking the aforementioned if they support them.

You obviously lack the skills and ability to discuss anything in an intellectual manor, so therefore I am stating this a plainly, bluntly and as simply as possible.

Please make note that when "everyone is missing" something that the odds are extremely high that your pompousness is at full throttle and that indeed you are the one "missing" the something. You have been told by a medical doctor, a lawyer, and an ethicist, and numerous other highly intelligent people that are obviously much more functionally literate than you, that you are wrong and your information is completely wrong and irrefutably wrong.

There are no elective late term abortions, for the past 35 years the only ones allowed under federal law are ones that are medically necessary. So how on earth could someone support or not support a procedure as you describe that does not exist, i.e. you cannot have round squares.

Do us all a favor and read the Roe v. Wade?it is most obvious that you have never taken the time to read it or anything about it. Then read the opinions of the justices. (Please dear God have 6thgen take the time to actually inform himself, before he goes bounding off on another tirade.)

The reason for the ?radio silence? is that it has been universally determined by those that choose not to post anymore that you lack the ability to understand any form of simple reason and that you apparently have a skull that is as hard as diamonds and as dense at plutonium.

I am most certain that you have absolutely no idea on earth what any of the above paragraphs, mean, but I will have one hell of a time laughing at you when you try to rebut; which you will.

Thank you in advance for the laugh.

Now back to ?radio silence? and the red herring is still firmly yours.


p.s. please note that in no way shape or form have you been called any names in the above paragraphs.

 

[Andy A]

And the ignore button now goes on! Ding!

jdarg, to start this post let me assure you, being what I consider a moderate Republican, I am Pro Choice. Your responses to 6th Gen are out of line. His questions are legitimate. The point I wish to make is that anyone who resorts to the "ignore" button is only saying I can't counter what you are saying. If you don't want to read or respond to soneone's argument, that is fine but as far as I'm concerned, in debate or discussion the "ignore" button is a piece of crap, not worthy of recognition on this board if freedom of communication is one of the prime objectives.

 

[Jdarg]

Uh, Bdarg, what are we doing? I just realized how pointless it is to argue with someone like 6thGen. it is also impossible to have a real discussion with someone that has zero respect for anyone else's knowledge or professional opinion, 6thGen is the be-all, end-all expert on every hot button topic on earth! Truly an amazing individual.