It seems to me that approximately a week to 10 days after any news event, the media try to juice up the story to maintain the interest of the reader, listener or watcher. This often involves playing the "race" card.
While I am sure that the people who lived along the MS coast would argue that they have been ignored compared to the people in NO, that was not based upon poverty or race. That said, those persons who had been instructed by their mayor to evacuate NO and could not, due to lack of transportation and money, could say that because of their financial situation (arguably due in some part to racial discrimination) they bore the brunt of the flooding. If blame is to be placed, it seems to me it should be placed on the NO mayor for not planning ahead for the means for those disadvantaged persons to evacuate and a safe place to which they could evacuate. If he needed federal assistance, that should have been requested well before the event occurred.
I have four evacuees (their dog, their birds and their gerbil) living with me and and my family. They had two cars and credit cards and the means to escape to a relative's house. While this has been a terrible tragedy for them, it is nothing compared to those who did not have those means and were left in their flooded homes or even worse, in the Super Dome.
Question for liberals and conservatives: Does the performance of government at all levels in preparation for and response to Katrina justify increasing or decreasing funding for governmental programs?