• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

slandmarks

Beach Comber
Mar 23, 2007
36
0
www.southernlandmarks.com
Greenspan Book
Criticizes Bush
And Republicans

'They Deserved to Lose';
Former Fed Chief Defends
Pre-Bubble Rate Cuts
By GREG IP and EMILY STEEL
September 15, 2007

In a withering critique of his fellow Republicans, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan says in his memoir that the party to which he has belonged all his life deserved to lose power last year for forsaking its small-government principles.
In "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World," published by Penguin Press, Mr. Greenspan criticizes both congressional Republicans and President George W. Bush for abandoning fiscal discipline.
The book is scheduled for public release Monday. The Wall Street Journal bought a copy at a bookstore in the New York area.
HC-EI109_Greens_20051017124456.gif

Mr. Greenspan, who calls himself a "lifelong libertarian Republican," writes that he advised the White House to veto some bills to curb "out-of-control" spending while the Republicans controlled Congress. He says President Bush's failure to do so "was a major mistake." Republicans in Congress, he writes, "swapped principle for power. They ended up with neither. They deserved to lose."
Many economists say the Fed, by cutting short-term interest rates to 1% in mid-2003 and keeping them there for a year, helped foster a housing bubble that is now bursting. In his book, which was largely written before much of the recent turmoil in credit markets, Mr. Greenspan defends the policy. "We wanted to shut down the possibility of corrosive deflation," he writes. "We were willing to chance that by cutting rates we might foster a bubble, an inflationary boom of some sort, which we would subsequently have to address....It was a decision done right."
He attributes the housing boom to the end of communism, which he says unleashed hundreds of millions of workers on global markets, putting downward pressure on wages and prices, and thus on long-term interest rates.
Mr. Greenspan retired in early 2006 after 18 years as chairman of the Federal Reserve. He had served under six presidents as either Fed chairman or adviser. He now runs a private consulting company; his only formal public role is adviser to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
Penguin paid an advance of more than $8 million last year for Mr. Greenspan's book, according to people familiar with the matter. Promotion for the book includes appearances by Mr. Greenspan on CBS's "60 Minutes," NBC's "Today" and CNBC, interviews with foreign and U.S. media, book signings and speaking engagements. The book's official release comes a day before the most-watched Fed meeting of the year. On Tuesday, Mr. Greenspan's successor, Ben Bernanke, must decide whether to cut interest rates to cushion the economy from the reversal of the housing boom that began under Mr. Greenspan's watch.
His book is half memoir and half treatise on the state of the world and its future. While much of the ground has been covered either in his own previous public remarks or in other books, Mr. Greenspan sheds new light on many policy decisions, offers often-trenchant observations of the presidents he has known and makes some surprising economic forecasts, unmuffled by the often opaque and complex phraseology he used as Fed chairman. Critics, however, may seize on his continued defense of decisions they say led to first a stock bubble and then a housing bubble, and on some assertions that differ from the historical record.
Mr. Greenspan writes that when President Bush chose Dick Cheney as vice president and Paul O'Neill as treasury secretary -- both colleagues from the Gerald Ford administration, during which Mr. Greenspan was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers -- he "indulged in a bit of fantasy" that this would be the government that would have resulted if Mr. Ford hadn't lost to Jimmy Carter in 1976. But Mr. Greenspan discovered that in the Bush White House, the "political operation was far more dominant" than in Mr. Ford's. "Little value was placed on rigorous economic policy debate or the weighing of long-term consequences," he writes.
From serving under so many presidents, Mr. Greenspan concludes that there's something abnormal about anyone willing to do what it takes to get the job. Mr. Ford, he writes, "was as close to normal as you get in a president, but he was never elected." The Watergate tapes, he says, show Richard Nixon as "an extremely smart man who is sadly paranoid, misanthropic and cynical." He recalls telling someone who had accused Nixon of anti-Semitism that he "wasn't exclusively anti-Semitic. He was anti-Semitic, anti-Italian, anti-Greek, anti-Slovak. I don't know anybody he was pro."
Ronald Reagan's ability to instantly tap one-liners and anecdotes in support of a particular policy represented an "odd form of intelligence." He describes Bill Clinton as "a fellow information hound" with "a consistent, disciplined focus on long-term economic growth" whose relationship with Monica Lewinsky "made me feel disappointed and sad."
Mr. Greenspan makes no mention of his successor as Fed chairman, Mr. Bernanke, other than in a caption accompanying a picture: "I was very comfortable leaving the post in the hands of such an experienced successor," it reads.
He devotes chapters to each of the major economic challenges facing the U.S. and the world. On energy, he recommends more use of nuclear power, and he predicts efforts to reduce global warming with carbon caps or taxes will fail. Rising income inequality could undo "the cultural ties that bind our society" and even lead to "large-scale violence." The remedy, he says, is not higher taxes on the rich but improved education, which can be helped by paying math teachers more.
Mr. Greenspan returns repeatedly to the far-reaching importance of communism's collapse. He says it discredited central planning throughout the world and inspired China and later India to throw off socialist policies. He recalls meeting a former manager of a produce distribution center in China who says he once had to labor to allocate produce according to government edict; now the allocations are made by auction. "Now I don't have to get up at four a.m.," he quotes the manager as saying. "I can sleep in and let the market do my job for me." Mr. Greenspan recalls his amazement when an adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin asks him to discuss Ayn Rand, the libertarian philosopher with whom Mr. Greenspan had been friends.
In coming years, as the globalization process winds down, he predicts inflation will become harder to contain. Recent increases in the price of imports from China and a rise in long-term interest rates suggest "the turn may be upon us sooner rather than later."
Left alone, he said, the Fed's policy-making body, the Federal Open Market Committee, can keep inflation between 1% and 2%, but that could require forcing interest rates to double-digits, a level "not seen since the days of Paul Volcker," his predecessor as Fed chairman. "I fear that my successors on the FOMC, as they strive to maintain price stability in the coming quarter century, will run into populist resistance from Congress, if not from the White House," he writes.
If the Fed succumbs to that pressure, inflation could rise from a little over 2% at present to an average of 4% to 5% by the year 2030, he writes. Ten-year Treasury yields, now below 5%, will rise to "at least 8%" with the potential to go "significantly higher for brief periods." This, he says, will lead to stagnant returns on stocks and bonds and much smaller gains in housing prices.
Mr. Greenspan won plaudits for achieving low inflation and unemployment with just two mild recessions during his tenure at the Fed. But more recently his record has taken some knocks. Some critics fault him for not doing more to restrain the stock bubble of the 1990s, and for responding to its eventual bursting with such low interest rates that housing prices subsequently soared.
Mr. Greenspan writes that in early 1997, he told his colleagues the Fed should raise interest rates as a "preemptive" move against a stock-market bubble. But transcripts of Fed meetings from that period do not support his book's version of events: They show Mr. Greenspan argued for a rate increase principally because of inflation.
 

slandmarks

Beach Comber
Mar 23, 2007
36
0
www.southernlandmarks.com
Alan Greenspan claims Iraq war was really for oil

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article2461214.ece

AMERICA?s elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has shaken the White House by declaring that the prime motive for the war in Iraq was oil.
In his long-awaited memoir, to be published tomorrow, Greenspan, a Republican whose 18-year tenure as head of the US Federal Reserve was widely admired, will also deliver a stinging critique of President George W Bush?s economic policies.
However, it is his view on the motive for the 2003 Iraq invasion that is likely to provoke the most controversy. ?I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil,? he says.
Greenspan, 81, is understood to believe that Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the security of oil supplies in the Middle East.
 
Last edited:

Capricious

Beach Fanatic
Jul 11, 2005
423
42
"...The last time we had a Fed inflation fighter, the Prime went to 20, and everyone went to the unemployment line. .."


I remember well the "Reagan economic miracle."

In Dec. '82 I was waiting in line to pick-up
my (useless) college diploma without a job
waiting for me.

An informal poll of others in the line revealed
many in the same situation.

The headlines in the local newspaper for the
week:

"Worst unemployment in 40 years."

40 years earlier was the depression.
(cured by WW II)

And so began the decade of the '80s, not
a very profitable decade for me.

Taught me to be conservative with my finances.
 

SHELLY

SoWal Insider
Jun 13, 2005
5,763
803
"...The last time we had a Fed inflation fighter, the Prime went to 20, and everyone went to the unemployment line. .."


I remember well the "Reagan economic miracle."

In Dec. '82 I was waiting in line to pick-up
my (useless) college diploma without a job
waiting for me.

An informal poll of others in the line revealed
many in the same situation.

The headlines in the local newspaper for the
week:

"Worst unemployment in 40 years."

40 years earlier was the depression.
(cured by WW II)

And so began the decade of the '80s, not
a very profitable decade for me.

Taught me to be conservative with my finances.

How much in student loans and credit card debt were you carrying at the time?

.
 
Last edited:

Miss Kitty

Meow
Jun 10, 2005
47,011
1,131
70
After watching Mr. G on 60 Minutes last night...I must say I have a little crush. :love:
 

Capricious

Beach Fanatic
Jul 11, 2005
423
42
"...How much in student loans and credit card debt were you carrying at the time?..."



No debt. Momma paid for part, and I worked.

I worked for a year out of high school as a deckhand on towboats
on the Mississippi River & Gulf Intracoastal.

Went back out on the boats every summer break and every winter
break (when everyone else was home for Christmas or what-ever, I
was battleing ice on the illinois River.)

Always had a job during school: washed dishes at a country club,
washed dishes in the university cafeteria. Even was a model in the
art dept for a while.

By the way, the country club was Hickory Hills country club in Springfield,
MO. I learned later that at the time I was washing dishes inside, a guy
about my age was playing golf out on the course outside with his daddy.
He turned pro and made a lot of money until he took a trip in a Lear jet
with pressurization problems.

If you don't count credit card balances which are paid in full at each statement, I have only borrowed money one time in my life.
 

Capricious

Beach Fanatic
Jul 11, 2005
423
42
"I remember well the "Reagan economic miracle."


No, your memory fails you. You can thank the peanut farmer president for your early 80's malaise.;-)



You a Bush supporter, 'eh ?

Listening to a little Rush are you?

I have about had my fill of Carter complaints.


By the way, you need to go back further; to Nixon and Ford

You forgot the 90 day wage and price freezes

And "WIN" buttons.

Carter inherited the last republican mess

Just like a Democrat will inherit the latest republican mess




P.S. Reagan was not GOD: he just played one on TV
 
New posts


Shop SoWal Photos

Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter