• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Bobskunk

Beach Lover
Jan 14, 2008
177
113
Additional Information

Below is a summary that I received from an industry group with whom I am affiliated. I think (and hope that you agree) that they tried to provide some specifics without editorial content. I have read it, but not studied each issue at great length. I think it's going to be pretty onerous on medium sized businesses, and may incent companies to limit expansion in order to keep payroll below the limits. I am also disappointed in the lack of tort reform.

Date: October 29, 2009

Action Taken: House leadership, led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), today announced completion of a health reform bill that combines the efforts of the House?s Committees on Education & Labor, Energy & Commerce, and Ways & Means.

Below is a summary of its major provisions.

Government/Public Plan Option: The bill contains a government/public plan option, based on rates to be negotiated by a new government agency (the Health Choices Commission, or HCC). The government plan option would be one of many (the bill?s authors hope) choices available to those who buy their insurance through an exchange. The government/public plan option would be subject to the same rules (e.g., insurance reform, essential benefits packages) as the private insurance sold through the exchange.

Exchange: The bill would create a national exchange. It would allow states to instead set up their own exchanges. Exchanges would offer private health insurance to individuals not otherwise covered by ?acceptable? insurance, and to small businesses.

The exchange would be set up and administered by a new government agency, the Health Choices Commission (HCA). The HCA would promulgate nondiscrimination and parity (mental health) rules.

The bill specifically authorizes licensed insurance agents to act as enrollment agents and brokers. Exchange insurance, including the public health insurance option, would be bought by eligible individuals and businesses through enrollment agents and brokers.

States would be required to assist groups who want to establish ?Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan Programs,? or ?co-ops? as options for health insurance that would be offered through the exchange.

Insurance Reforms: Beginning in 2010, a number of insurance reforms are mandated. They include:

? No rescissions except for fraud
? Guaranteed issue and renewability
? Limit on premium costs based on age to no more than a two to one ratio
? Community rating
? No use of health history or preexisting conditions (full prohibition against preexisting conditions becomes effective as of 1/1/13; between now and then, the look-back period is limited to 30 days; and exclusion of coverage due to preexisting conditions would be allowable for three rather than 12 months)
? No annual or lifetime benefit limits
? Parents could continue to cover their children on their health insurance policies up through age 26
? Insurance companies could have no more than an 85 percent loss ratio. If loss ratios fall below the 85 percent level, the excess would have to be rebated to policyholders. There is some flexibility built into this rule with respect to the individual market if market disruption results from the 85 percent loss ratio requirement.
? As of the date of enactment, employers would not be allowed to reduce retiree health benefits unless they are also reducing the same benefits for active employees
? Health insurers would have to provide at least 90 days notice prior to a premium increase

Long-Term Care Benefits: The melded House bill contains a new federal long term care program which would require employers to automatically enroll their workers (subject to an opt-out) in a program that would provide about $50/day in benefits in the event that the worker became unable (at least five years after beginning participation) to perform at least two activities of daily living. The employee-paid premium for the program?known as the CLASS Act?would be required to be actuarially sound, but is expected to be about $65/month, at least initially.

Individual Mandates: The bill contains an individual mandate that will require all individuals to carry health insurance. Failure to comply with this rule would result in an additional 2.5 percent tax on modified adjusted gross income. There would be a hardship exemption (based on affordability). There is language that specifies that those eligible for Medicaid, CHIP, Veterans Affairs (VA) coverage and other government health insurance programs would be deemed to have acceptable coverage.

Employer Mandate: The melded bill requires employers to offer and pay for health insurance for their workers. The rules are:

? Employers with payrolls of $750,000 or more would be subject to the mandate
? Employers subject to the mandate would have to pay at least 72.5 percent of the cost of individual coverage, and 65 percent of the cost of dependent coverage. ?Proportional? employer contributions to the premium would be required for ?non fulltime? workers.
? Employers with payrolls of $500,000 or less would be exempt from the employer mandate
? Failure to comply with the mandate would result in a tax of eight percent of payroll in excess of $750,000. A two percent tax would apply to payroll starting at $500,000, and the tax would graduate, in two percent increments, up to a payroll size of $750,000.
? There would be a two-year tax credit for small employers electing to offer health insurance to their workers. The credit would be equal to 50 percent of the cost of the insurance for employers with 9 or fewer workers. The credit would phase down for employers with 10 to 25 workers. It would not be available to employers with 26 or more workers.

Essential Benefits Package: For health insurance to count as satisfying the health insurance mandates, it must include at least the ?essential benefits package.? The rules include:

? The package would have to be offered on a nondiscriminatory basis
? It would be recommended by a new government entity, the Benefits Advisory Committee (BAC), and then approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
? Cost sharing would be limited, and could not exceed $5,000 in out of pocket spending for individual coverage, or $10,000 in dependent care coverage.
? The essential benefits package must have an actuarial value of at least 70 percent
? There could be no abortion benefits in an essential benefits package
? For policies that provide abortion benefits, there must be strict separation of private vs federal funds, and no federal funds could be used for abortion benefits

National Risk Pool: Between date of enactment and the date the exchange is up and operating (2013) there would be a national high risk pool program. Per this program, Congress would authorize $5 million to insure people who have been denied coverage due to preexisting conditions and/or who have been without coverage for ?several months.? The program would stop if and when the $5 million authorized is used up.

Antitrust Exemption: The bill states that the antitrust exemption available to health insurers and medical malpractice insurers would no longer be available for purposes of fixing prices, monopolizing markets, or dividing market territories.

Taxes (Offsets): The bill is principally offset by savings in Medicare (including Medicare Advantage) and new taxes. The new taxes include:

? An indexed annual cap of $2,500 on contributions to flexible spending accounts (FSAs)
? An increase from 10 percent to 20 percent in the penalty tax for early (prior to age 65) withdrawals (for nonmedical expenses) from health savings accounts (HSAs)
? Modification of rules for permissible tax-free withdrawals from HSAs, FSAs and/or health reimbursement accounts (HRAs) to disallow use of HRA/FSA/HSA tax-free funds for over-the-counter medicines, unless those medicines are obtained via prescription
? A 5.4 percent surcharge on modified adjusted gross income in excess of $500,000 for individuals and $1 million for married couples filing joint tax returns
? Elimination of the tax deduction for employers receiving government subsidies for providing retiree prescription drug coverage
? Tax parity for employer-provided health coverage for domestic partners and other non-dependents
? Information reporting for payments made to corporations
? A 2.5 percent excise tax on the sale of medical devises (excluding resales and retail sales) for use in the United States

Medical Malpractice: The bill contains a limited incentive to States to set up alternatives to litigation in cases of medical malpractice (e.g., ?early offer? or ?certificate of merit? programs).

Interstate Sales of Insurance: The bill would allow States to enter into compacts for purposes of sale of health insurance across state lines.

COBRA Extension: The bill would extend COBRA eligibility (from 18 or 36 months as under current law) for the period between the health reform bill?s enactment and the date by which the exchange would be up and operating.

Medicare: The bill cuts Medicare Advantage programs, and makes the Medicare Part D prescription drug program available to those in the ?donut hole??those with incomes above certain levels, but below other levels?starting in 2010.

Wellness/Information Technology: The bill also includes incentives for employers that offer wellness programs, so long as the programs are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis; and authorization for information technology programs.

Next Steps: The legislation is still subject to change via a still-emerging ?manager?s amendment?. The bill's full text and manager?s amendment will be publically available for 72 hours before Members are asked to vote. The bill could go to the House floor for a vote by late next week (November 5 or 6), although that target date could slip.
 

BeachSiO2

Beach Fanatic
Jun 16, 2006
3,294
737
In news reports this afternoon, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif) stated that there is a possibility of NO amendments to be allowed on the House floor. He is a very close ally to Speaker Pelosi so his comments carry more weight then many since it is up to the Rules Committee to decide, and they are appointed by Pelosi.

The dilemma is that there are a handful of groups who have stated that they will torpedo the bill if their amendments aren't voted on. The three biggest are the pro-life democrats who want to vote on whether or not federal funding can be used for abortions, the hispanic caucus who wants to vote on health benefits constraints to legal, documented immigrants, and the public option democrats who want to vote on the "robust option." It will be interesting politics to see if any of these amendments are actually allowed on the floor.
 
Last edited:

poppy

Banned
Sep 10, 2008
2,854
928
Miramar Beach

BeachSiO2

Beach Fanatic
Jun 16, 2006
3,294
737
I think you can get more information on the GOP plan here.
 

Andy A

Beach Fanatic
Feb 28, 2007
4,389
1,738
Blue Mountain Beach
What is that you don't understand regarding the fact that there is NO PLAN yet, whether you're a Democrat or Republican supporter? The film clip says exactly that.
Representative Boehner is absolutely correct when he states, as he as on many occasions, that the GOP has made many suggestions for real healthcare reform, both in committee and individually. None of these suggestions, including tort reform, have been accepted by the Democratic leadership. So much for partisanship. When there is a plan actually ready to be voted on by both the House and Senate we will have something to really comment on. Until then everything any of us has to say is pure conjecture.
 

poppy

Banned
Sep 10, 2008
2,854
928
Miramar Beach
What is that you don't understand regarding the fact that there is NO PLAN yet, whether you're a Democrat or Republican supporter? The film clip says exactly that.
Representative Boehner is absolutely correct when he states, as he as on many occasions, that the GOP has made many suggestions for real healthcare reform, both in committee and individually. None of these suggestions, including tort reform, have been accepted by the Democratic leadership. So much for partisanship. When there is a plan actually ready to be voted on by both the House and Senate we will have something to really comment on. Until then everything any of us has to say is pure conjecture.

What is it that you don't understand regarding kkddbb's many insane claims? He states the gop has a great plan but will not say what that plan is. I agree wth you on the fact there is no final plan.
 

AlphaCrab

Beach Fanatic
Sep 25, 2008
981
182
Inlet Beach
How do Republicans see 177 U.S. death occuring daily amongst those folks without health insurance..with their response being that (1) they are first of all just against it and (2) they don't have a single thing to offer as an alternative plan?
 
Why do we need a government option? The summary says they will be governed by the same rules as the privates and all will be sold and regulated through the "exchanges" and the new Health Commission. Does anyone really think a government run program will be more cost effective than private enterprise? The only way the government option will be price competitive will be to subsidize it heavily at additional cost to the taxpayers or unfairly regulate the privates. Either way the consumer/taxpayer loses.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter