yippie's last post just made me think of a good analogy (possibly) that would come from the perspective of a gulf front private beach owner.
Let's say you are an owner next to the public access and public parking at one of the public beach accesses, let's choose Inlet Beach for discussion-sake. At Inlet Beach, it doesn't seem like parking is inadequate at this time, but in a few years it could be. Visitors to the beach, whether they are tourists or upland owners, decide it's okay to park in or block your driveway so that they can have access to the beach. You decide to put up a physical obstruction like a gate to your driveway, or you decide to call the Sheriff's department to have them towed as they block access to your personal property. How far do we take this? Where do you draw the line between personal property rights and the right to access the beach?
Let's say you are an owner next to the public access and public parking at one of the public beach accesses, let's choose Inlet Beach for discussion-sake. At Inlet Beach, it doesn't seem like parking is inadequate at this time, but in a few years it could be. Visitors to the beach, whether they are tourists or upland owners, decide it's okay to park in or block your driveway so that they can have access to the beach. You decide to put up a physical obstruction like a gate to your driveway, or you decide to call the Sheriff's department to have them towed as they block access to your personal property. How far do we take this? Where do you draw the line between personal property rights and the right to access the beach?