Legislature to tackle sagging pants

[SHELLY]

Florida State Legislature's idea of appropriate attire:
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.

.

 

[hnooe]

Just what we need -- police officers having to arrest people for wearing pants that don't fit. What is next on the exponentially growing list of gov't control. If genitals and buttocks are being exposed due to baggy pants, there are already laws in place to control that. We don't need more.

Ditto, ditto, ditto....not a police prioity.

 

[Cheering472]

They aren't banning "Baggy" pants, just "saggy" pants.

I understood that, thus the comment about tripping over them, but thanks for the clarification. I can always use the help.

 

[Matt J]

The schools can make their own dress code. Businesses can adopt something similar to the old "No Shirts No Shoes No Dice." Yet another waste of resources. (Also thinly veiled racism, no?)

Okay, when I first read this I thought you meant that business's could use it for there employees. Then I reread it and understand now. I certainly don't look highly on business's that allow there employees to dress with the "sag".

 

[Matt J]

Okay, it's not really true, but give it an edit and show it to your kids that want to sag there pants, guaranteed they'll be copying old men in no time.

http://www.snopes.com/risque/homosex/sagging.asp

 

[Mango]

Florida State Legislature's idea of appropriate attire:.
.

.

:funn:

 

[Busta Hustle]

please move on...enough said about sagging breast

 

[beach blessings]

Smiling Joe put it perfect...Just enforce the law we have. We have almost evey law needed...jsut not a system that enforces it!

 

[Lollerwaffle]

Good grief. I wish the concept of "small government" even existed anymore. I find it ironic how certain ideals of the two parties have seemingly flip flopped. Democrats tend think that the government should stay out of social issues, such as abortion, gay marriage, etc. And this is democratic voters I am speaking of here. All of the actual candidates never come out clearly and say "I think gays should be able to marry." No, they're way too afraid of pissing off a large group of people, and losing votes.

The republicans are for tax cuts, personal responsibility, etc. Once upon a time, I hear they believed in this 'small government' idea. Telling a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body, openly trying to pass DISCRIMANATORY laws against homosexuals, rooting for more prayer and religion and intelligent design being taught in schools, filling our court systems with and wasting our tax dollars on people for smoking pot...well, those sort of actions aren't really my idea of small government. What happened?

All I really want is a socially liberal, fiscally conservative candidate that is not afraid to take a stand on social issues just because they don't want to offend. The government should deal with issues such as money, war, and creating laws that actually protect the public. Politicians really need to stay out of my private, social life.

 

[Smiling JOe]

All I really want is a socially liberal, fiscally conservative candidate that is not afraid to take a stand on social issues just because they don't want to offend. The government should deal with issues such as money, war, and creating laws that actually protect the public. Politicians really need to stay out of my private, social life.

Go Lollerwaffle!