You asked a specific question and I gave you a specific answer. If you choose to bring the corporate world into this for failures, let us discuss this. When Financial Institutions were having failures who was it that bailed them out? Those CEOs with their Golden Parachutes weren't going hungry. Sure they lost their jobs but I will bet those folks further down the chain were taking a huge hit when the Corporate Office had to figure out who else needed to be let go to pay for it. That guy who answers the phone to answer question probably went looking for a job. The lack of Customary Use will negatively affect tourism which will affect employment opportunities. That is a failure on our leaders selling our area to business. If we had spent money to advertise to business like we have to tourist we may have a more balanced economy. Let me ask you this, how long have you lived here? Are you a beachfront property owner? If yes, since you lived here, how many times prior to 2015 have you called the law to have people removed from the beach near your home? I want you to understand, I am not attempting to be disrespectful and I am not going to get in the name calling, so lets be clear if this conversation starts to deteriorate by supporters of either side I will not be involved. You also didn't answer my question, if those who own homes overlooking the beach lose in the courts, are you calling it quits?Bob, this is not about a “disagreement”. The difference between my opinion and the commissioner’s opinion, if the commissioners opinion is wrong it cost all tax payers multi-millions of dollar$$$.
If a business CEO or board of directors inserted their personal feelings and agenda into an investment that then cost the stockholders multi-millions of dollars in litigation, zero return, and a decades of ill will; what do you think the consequence would be for that CEO? They would or should be terminated or resign. The stockholders would also have recourse in the courts to recoup money lost for negligent CEO decisions.
But it’s all Walton property-tax payer’s millions; it’s not commissioner’s money. There are no consequences. You think Walton attorney David Theriaqu is going to tell the commissioners they do not have a great case? Theriaqu gets his $425/hr and $0 if the commissioners reconsider. So Theriaqu has zero wins on three individual Walton customary use cases over the years.
At worse the commissioners get voted out of office or get hired as the County Administrator for more money and the tax payer keeps on paying. This is about consequences for costing tax payers many MILLIONS of dollars and could get nothing but ill will. That's not doing their job.
If you or commissioners are so sure common law customary use is superior to private property rights would you risk your own money? Hundreds of beachfront owners will. If it was commissioners own money do you think the votes to litigate would be the same? I doubt it. Commissioners should at least be be accountable and resign. Maybe Walton voters would vote for commissioners that have experience running a $171,400,000 organization and investing tax payers dollars that will have a return on investment. I can dream too.