For the record....I only endorse female mud wrestling.
For RO, got any pix


For the record....I only endorse female mud wrestling.
First, let me say that I fully believe that it is wrong to torture animals. (I learned this after killing many ants and beetles with a magnifying glass as a kid.sorry.) Someone on this thread suggested we do the same to Vick as he did to the dogs. While I will not directly associate the entertainment-sport of football to the killing of dogs, I think in some small ways, the dog fighting is not too dissimilar to football. There are typically two opponents, each rewarded for winning. The losing team is punished. (there is no comparison to killing the loser to having a reduction in pay or being traded. -- don't take my comparison that literally.) There is also a crowd of spectators, usually betting on one team or dog to win. Some football teams, like UGA, are even named the Bulldogs. With professional teams, there is an owner, just like the dogs' owner. They are in it for the money. If their "dog" isn't making money, they find a better-trained "dog" to put on the team and ditch the "dog" which isn't producing.
I seem to recall a history in Rome, when men were placed in a ring to fight to the death. It was a spectator sport. While today's football game is a long way from the old Roman sports, on the surface, it isn't greatly different in action. There is just more civility now, and big paychecks for the actual players.
While I don't watch football regularly, I have enjoyed playing football in high school, and I have enjoyed watching a few college and pro games. Am I blaming Vick's actions on football? Not at all. I'm just observing slight similarities between the Vick and the dogs.
With all due respect for your observations, and in spite of these similarities, I don't think the analogy holds to modern football. As we all learned in the movie "Gladiator"cool
those men were forced to fight, much like the dogs in question. They weren't offered 100 times the salary of the current Roman Emperor for their "sport." Those men had to fight or die, just like these dogs. Vick and his kind may blow out a knee and end up in a wealth management position, at the worst.
Furthermore, there have been a number of men who played professional football and proved themselves honorable. I'm thinking of Steve Bartkowski--ironically, quarterback for the Atlanta Falcons in my childhood. He was a client of the landscape company I worked for in Atlanta, and I heard nothing but wonderful, glowing descriptions of him. (We also had another client who was a notable NFL retiree from the same era, but I only heard what an SOB he was.)
I've also known people who worked for Evander Holyfield. His sport is much more violent, yet he has a reputation for kindness and generosity.
Vick's teammates Keith Brooking and Warrick Dunn also are known around here for philanthropy. (http://www.keithbrookingfoundation.org/, http://warrickdunnfoundation.org/) I don't know much about Brooking's past, but Dunn didn't grow up privileged and entitled.
No excuses...
NoHall, I think you take my similarities too much at heart. I agree with your comments. Yes, gladiators were slaves, forced to fight, to keep living another day, just like the dogs. They were not paid money, but much money was earned off of them. Today, as I mentioned, the times have changed. Now, Athletes make the big money, though others who bet or own teams, have the ability to win or lose money, just as the betters in the dog fights. You are absolutely right, that the players don't have to play, and you are right that there are likely to be many respectable people playing in all sports, just as there are also criminals playing too. Having a phat paycheck doesn't make you who you are, nor does a fancy title or job.With all due respect for your observations, and in spite of these similarities, I don't think the analogy holds to modern football. As we all learned in the movie "Gladiator"cool
those men were forced to fight, much like the dogs in question. They weren't offered 100 times the salary of the current Roman Emperor for their "sport." Those men had to fight or die, just like these dogs. Vick and his kind may blow out a knee and end up in a wealth management position, at the worst.
Furthermore, there have been a number of men who played professional football and proved themselves honorable. I'm thinking of Steve Bartkowski--ironically, quarterback for the Atlanta Falcons in my childhood. He was a client of the landscape company I worked for in Atlanta, and I heard nothing but wonderful, glowing descriptions of him. (We also had another client who was a notable NFL retiree from the same era, but I only heard what an SOB he was.)
I've also known people who worked for Evander Holyfield. His sport is much more violent, yet he has a reputation for kindness and generosity.
Vick's teammates Keith Brooking and Warrick Dunn also are known around here for philanthropy. (http://www.keithbrookingfoundation.org/, http://warrickdunnfoundation.org/) I don't know much about Brooking's past, but Dunn didn't grow up privileged and entitled.
No excuses...
NoHall, I think you take my similarities too much at heart. I agree with your comments. Yes, gladiators were slaves, forced to fight, to keep living another day, just like the dogs. They were not paid money, but much money was earned off of them. Today, as I mentioned, the times have changed. Now, Athletes make the big money, though others who bet or own teams, have the ability to win or lose money, just as the betters in the dog fights. You are absolutely right, that the players don't have to play, and you are right that there are likely to be many respectable people playing in all sports, just as there are also criminals playing too. Having a phat paycheck doesn't make you who you are, nor does a fancy title or job.
There were days when I admired great athletes, but those times have changed. I give some respect for their abilities, but no more than I would give an artist for her abilities. Each may be deserving. Today, rather than watch a game, I would much prefer to throw a Frisbee on the beach with a friend, or just sit and talk about life.
There were days when I admired great athletes, but those times have changed. I give some respect for their abilities, but no more than I would give an artist for her abilities. Each may be deserving. Today, rather than watch a game, I would much prefer to throw a Frisbee on the beach with a friend, or just sit and talk about life.