dead horse? 46 states approve, and its a dead horse in South Walton, because people with enough time on their hands to post often, support the prolific SoWal buddy on his and like two others initial rejection of the plan that would potentially cost them as much as 5 seconds a few times a year??
Robertsondavies,
A dead horse is when the same people keep saying the same things and there is pretty much nothing else left to say that would change things.
I acknowledge that I should have my head examined for jumping back in here. But I can't resist calling BS, especially when it's on folks who are going out of their way to rib me. So back to the discussion-
You're now saying that the opposition to lowering the speed limit is futile (my words, not yours) when considering that 46 other state legislatures have already agreed (your words).
But you left out the important part. You never said exactly what 46 state legislatures have agreed on.
Is it:
A) 46 States have agreed to allow LSV's to be licensed, registered and driven on roads where the speed limit is 35MPH or less (like here)
Or is it:
B) 46 States have agreed to lower the speed limit on rural highways from 45MPH to 35MPH to accomodate a small group of LSV enthusiasts.
If you can prove B then I take back what I said about your arguments being weak because this would mean that your case is evidently strong enough to influence those in power to implement your desired changes.
But if you can only prove A then your statement that your other arguments "won the day in 46 state legislatures" is useless here.
Cheers, Geo
P.S. Who exactly is this "prolific SoWal buddy" you speak of?
