• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

wrobert

Beach Fanatic
Nov 21, 2007
4,132
575
63
DeFuniak Springs
www.defuniaksprings.com
National Journal?s 2007 Voter Ratings
By Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor
Published Thursday, Jan. 31, 2008
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal's 27th annual vote ratings. The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate.
?
In their yearlong race for the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama and Clinton have had strikingly similar voting records. Of the 267 measures on which both senators cast votes in 2007, the two differed on only 10. "The policy differences between Clinton and Obama are so slight they are almost nonexistent to the average voter," said Richard Lau, a Rutgers University political scientist.
?
Indeed, the similarities in Obama's and Clinton's voting records last year were extensive. Both supported most measures aimed at withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. Both supported comprehensive immigration legislation including a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. Both voted to support most Democratic positions on health care, education, energy, and the budget, and both voted against most Republican positions on those topics.
But NJ's vote ratings are designed to draw distinctions that illuminate the differences among lawmakers. The calculations ranked senators relative to each other based on the 99 key votes and assigned scores in three areas: economic issues, social issues, and foreign policy. (House members were scored in a separate set of rankings. The full results for both chambers will be published in our March 8 issue.)
On foreign policy, for example, Obama's liberal score of 92 and conservative score of 7 indicate that he was more liberal in that issue area than 92 percent of the senators and more conservative than 7 percent. Clinton was more liberal than 83 percent of the senators on foreign policy and more conservative than 16 percent.
?
Overall in NJ's 2007 ratings, Obama voted the liberal position on 65 of the 66 key votes on which he voted; Clinton voted the liberal position 77 of 82 times. Obama garnered perfect liberal scores in both the economic and social categories. His score in the foreign-policy category was nearly perfect, pulled down a notch by the only conservative vote that he cast in the ratings, on a Republican-sponsored resolution expressing the sense of Congress that funding should not be cut off for U.S. troops in harm's way.
?
To view the entire article please visit:
http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/
 

InletBchDweller

SoWal Insider
Feb 14, 2006
6,802
263
56
Prairieville, La
I should have figured.:dunno: Every "who is the best President for you" multiple choice test that I have taken always puts Obama as the furthest away from my beliefs.
 

Jdarg

SoWal Expert
Feb 15, 2005
18,039
1,984
I don't see a problem with his voting record. Of course I'm one of those wacko liberal types.:lol:

The title of this thread is amusing, and will get predictable results and responses. Gotta love bait- works like a charm.
 

hnooe

Beach Fanatic
Jul 21, 2007
3,022
640
I don't see a problem with his voting record. Of course I'm one of those wacko liberal types.:lol:

The title of this thread is amusing, and will get predictable results and responses. Gotta love bait- works like a charm.

OOOhhhh Liberals, it is a very scary word, almost as bad as Progressive..ghast!..eeeeckkkk. :yikes:

"Lawdie, lawdie, Liberals... how did they ever get into the Panhandle."
 

rapunzel

Beach Fanatic
Nov 30, 2005
2,514
980
Point Washington
I just keep scratching my head and wondering what Walton GOP's objective is here? Why keep posting all this anti-Obama stuff? What is the point, since he supports no one, certainly not Hillary Clinton? Why would a die hard Republican insist on trashing one of the opposing party's candidates in the primaries, rather than championing his own?:dunno:
 

Jdarg

SoWal Expert
Feb 15, 2005
18,039
1,984
I just keep scratching my head and wondering what Walton GOP's objective is here? Why keep posting all this anti-Obama stuff? What is the point, since he supports no one, certainly not Hillary Clinton? Why would a die hard Republican insist on trashing one of the opposing party's candidates in the primaries, rather than championing his own?:dunno:

See my post on the Obama fundraising thread.

Walton GOP- behave yourself!:wave: You are practically giddy- excited about Karl Rove's visit to DeFunk?
 

wrobert

Beach Fanatic
Nov 21, 2007
4,132
575
63
DeFuniak Springs
www.defuniaksprings.com
I don't see a problem with his voting record. Of course I'm one of those wacko liberal types.:lol:

The title of this thread is amusing, and will get predictable results and responses. Gotta love bait- works like a charm.

I guess I do need to ease up a bit. Hopefully Rapunzel will not hold it against me. She is to be commended. She has set an example of participation for all of us to aspire too.
 

Teresa

SoWal Guide
Staff member
Nov 15, 2004
30,893
9,500
South Walton, FL
sowal.com
I just keep scratching my head and wondering what Walton GOP's objective is here? Why keep posting all this anti-Obama stuff? What is the point, since he supports no one, certainly not Hillary Clinton? Why would a die hard Republican insist on trashing one of the opposing party's candidates in the primaries, rather than championing his own?:dunno:

oh, I thought you knew the Rove conspiracy hatched a few years ago. you know, the one bdarg let us in on a few weeks ago - of course we all suspected. you really don't know why a die hard republican's wildest dream is to have hillary nominated for President of the US? surely you jest.

Rove is still pulling the strings sitting right in his pretty little RB house or wherever the hail he lives.
 

Lollerwaffle

Beach Comber
Dec 27, 2007
26
1
Rapunzel, I don't exactly see how posting legitimate political news articles in the POLITICS forum translates into "trashing" a candidate for you.

Karl Rove is definitely satan incarnate.
 

Teresa

SoWal Guide
Staff member
Nov 15, 2004
30,893
9,500
South Walton, FL
sowal.com
I guess I do need to ease up a bit. Hopefully Rapunzel will not hold it against me. She is to be commended. She has set an example of participation for all of us to aspire too.


walton - you don't have to worry about punzy. she can handle herself. you are just as fair and easy to converse with (and you teach us a lot as she does), if coming from another viewpoint.

I think she's teasing you. well, she's probably serious, but not.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter