Edroedrog and Vagrant I am waiting on a fax of the letter from another person who was involved in our fight against lot 1 she thinks she has it in a file and once I have it I will type as much of it as I can so you can read it. And yes Vagrant this letter which should be public record (if it is not there anymore this could be another conspiracy theory opportunity for you just on the other side) voids the letter sent by the County to Redfish which was cited in the article today. That is just one reason the article is wrong.
The other question I have for both of you is are you saying that you are relying on the rule of "(i) No new commercial or workplace uses shall be established within a 250-foot buffer around areas.."? Were you under the impression that they had presented this as a commercial or workplace use because that is not my understanding from being in the meeting.
Look below KT I found the facts about commercial property in Florida. I am going to leave this one up to you. Lets see what kind of spin local Government puts on this. You ask me to post the facts. Here they are.
http://dor.myflorida.com/dor/property/definitions.html. Scan down the page you will find it.
"Real estate used and owned as a homestead" means real property to the extent provided in s. 6(a), Art. VII of the State Constitution, but less any portion thereof used for commercial purposes, with the title of such property being recorded in the official records of the county in which the property is located. Property rented for more than 6 months is presumed to be used for commercial purposes.
So are you telling me that the rental agent that RFV has signed up for is not going to rent these condos. Because if you are than you know something that we all do not know. Ask RFV who is going to be the Rental Agent for these properties.
Walton County, Code of Ordinance (I am referenceing this because it has the commercial piece in it that KT is confused about) is what the Little Man would have to use if they wanted to do something with their property and is what I am suppose to go by too.
I am going to list the again so everyone can keep up. Get our your rulers neighbors because it looks to me that this in fil is within 250' of several Residential Preservation Areas within the NPA district.
"e. Compatibility with Existing Neighborhoods: The compatibility of new development with existing adjacent neighborhoods shall be considered as part of the review of any proposal for development within the NPA district. To accomplish this, all individual project plans and Neighborhood Plans shall establish a specific combination and quantity of uses which relate to existing adjacent conditions and in effect, preserve or enhance the desirable aspects of existing development in the adjacent areas and ensure compatible new development. The specific criteria which shall be used to by an applicant, where applicable, establish a presumption of compatibility are as follows:
(i) No new commercial or workplace uses shall be established within a 250-foot buffer around areas which meet the definition of Residential Preservation Areas within the NPA district. This specific buffer does not apply to areas designated as Coastal Center, Mixed Use Center, Light Industrial Center or Court Ordered Overlay District on the FLUM."
KT-You saw all the brown on that fact filled map. If I recall the map has a lot of Residential Preservation Areas on it.
Everyone has asked me to stick to the issue and I have. I have found all this information on FL Dept Rev and State of Florida websites.
Last edited: