I believe both of you are correct regarding in that the statement should have been the ECL, not the CCL. I've never heard of a CCL, but there is a CCCL.
I thought the CCL was the Coastal Control Line and is already the documented boundary/limit for habitable space oceanfront.
It's a hell of a lot further inland than the MHWL, which is why I got so excited!
BeachSiO2, Not that you personally have a dog in this seawall issue, I'm sure you see people sometime speak from their emotions rather than their mind. I'm also guilty!I understand and I agree. I am just saying that ones that were designed by a qualified professional and constructed as designed should survive their design storm. However, like everything else they will have to maintained just like painting a house, replacing a roof, paving a road, etc. Not to mention when some people heard what a bigger wall would cost, often they allowed price to dictate which level of protection they sought.
Actually, there were less than a handful that I am aware of that were designed and construction was overseen by a true coastal engineer. I will be watching those to see the difference in construction methods and quality if/when they are directly impacted.
What you say is true with this caveat. Most of the houses and condominiums in Walton county that are forward of the CCCL were constructed before a CCCL was put into place. I don't know exactly when it was instituted but it was after l983. Also, at least one condominium development I know of, violated the CCCL and nothing was done about it at the time or since.From the Florida DEP website:
"Adoption of a coastal construction control line establishes an area of jurisdiction in which special siting and design criteria are applied for construction and related activities. These standards may be more stringent than those already applied in the rest of the coastal building zone because of the greater forces expected to occur in the more seaward zone of the beach during a storm event."
Most houses on the beachfront in SoWal are at least partially south if not entirely south of the CCCL.
What you say is true with this caveat. Most of the houses and condominiums in Walton county that are forward of the CCCL were constructed before a CCCL was put into place. I don't know exactly when it was instituted but it was after l983. Also, at least one condominium development I know of, violated the CCCL and nothing was done about it at the time or since.
It is my understanding they were permitted to exceed the CCCL by a certain number of feet (minimal) and they then exceeded that in order to construct and landscape their plans desired. While the line may be one of regulation, it has always been my understanding that it was also one of prohibition. I am not informed enough about it to state unequivocally one way or the other.