I would like to respond to TWT512" post regarding the DRB process within the Watersound Development. He states just 10% have a negative experience, and suggest with the correct architect, the process should be much smoother. The problem I have with this statement is that owners are required to use ONLY their approved list of architects! Now I don't understand, how or why if Watersound DRB requires one to use only the approved Watersound architects that there should even be 10% (which is extremely low cause I know at least 15 very unhappy owners). Like other owners, I took my time and interviewed several approved architects. I made my choice based on his prior experience within Watercolor and other developments. When I began my quest to build in Watersound, other than Mr. Christ, no one else had even began a home in Watersound. Its obvious some architects are allowed the right to ignore the DRB pattern book, while others like myself have to adhere not only to the guide book, but in addition to the subjective opinions and personal taste's of the DRB board. Would have been nice to have had the opportunity to have one the architects who have been allowed to work outside the DRB pattern book and guidelines, however two years into the process, its a little to late to change. I guess the moral to the story is before you purchase a lot in a St. Joe development, try to find out which architects on the approved list are allowed to work outside their guide book and get the "DRB rubber stamp of approval", otherwise expect a lot of headaches and problems. It would be extremely helpful if the Watersound DRB could put little astrict's by those architects names so owners and their families are subjected to their abuse!