What may be ridiculous is that the collective thought is that politicians like Hillary can be around for 30-40 years, taking money from everyone/corporation/government possible, and thinking, even remotely, that she could be the best possible outcome. You have to have a wide moral sphere to give this type of egregious behavior a pass.Oh please! Spare me the sermon! [edit] And to answer your pie in the sky hypothetical thought experiment question, the answer is of course I would vote for her if I thought she was the best choice no matter what line she crossed. This is ridiculous. It would mean that whomever she was running against is even worse. What mature moral adult wouldn't go that route?
I'm referring specifically about Hillary. I'm challenging you giving her a pass because"she's your candidate", or the Republicans are crazy. At what point would you ever admit that she is also part of the problem?This sums up my thoughts too. That makes $0.04. The Republicans stand for too many things I can't accept. Plus, they are crazy.
If what I have shown you in this thread does not illustrate my point well enough for you, then, nothing will. Her sitting for 9 hours has nothing to do with how she conducts her never ending quest for tribute from anyone willing to give. This is not a Democrat/ Republican issue. This is about understanding who you are voting for and the rationalizations that allow political dynasties regardless of the greed and corruption.Bob, you seem to be painting Clinton as some sort of hideous monster. Let's face it: they are clever, smart politicians. I had to admire someone who sat for 9 hours against an onslaught of Republican attack at the 9th Bengazi committee hearing, without flinching. Every election is always a choice of the lesser of two evils. What candidate are you favoring at this point?
What may be ridiculous is that the collective thought is that politicians like Hillary can be around for 30-40 years, taking money from everyone/corporation/government possible, and thinking, even remotely, that she could be the best possible outcome. You have to have a wide moral sphere to give this type of egregious behavior a pass.
The last tranformational candidate was Barack Obama and see what that got us. I'm not sure absolute moral imperatives are a wise criteria to use in presidential politics anymore. Is voting for Bernie the equivalent of voting for Nader?
What you talkin' 'bout Willis?The last tranformational candidate was Barack Obama and see what that got us. I'm not sure absolute moral imperatives are a wise criteria to use in presidential politics anymore. Is voting for Bernie the equivalent of voting for Nader?
Tell us which Republican sleazebag you support and why.I'm referring specifically about Hillary. I'm challenging you giving her a pass because"she's your candidate", or the Republicans are crazy. At what point would you ever admit that she is also part of the problem?