Gundee,
Do you mean this quote: I have learned that there is no one size fits all when it comes to getting married in this new millennium. Nonetheless, there are some things that probably should be known up front, agreed to, and respected by both the husband and wife, i.e., who will be the ultimate decision maker (role), what will each be responsible for individually, and how will the couple reconcile their differences.
I agree there is no "one size fits all" in today's marriage - but with respect to the rest of the paragraph - if this is indeed your question, then I respectfully disagree - maybe that is too strong a word and I just see things differently. Mostly it is that, in my marriage there was and currently is, no way of knowing what type of challenges and hurdles and joys we will have to grapple with in the future so there just is no way to prepare for this by discussing them. When we have obstacles to overcome we just talk together and try reach consensus - at times I compromise, at times he does - and at others we reach happy medium. There is no ultimate decision maker and we are both perfectly happy with this.
And we reconcile our differences the old fashioned way - we talk, respect the other's position and no-one asserts their will on the other. Full stop, period! Make sense?
Thank you, Chickpea, for your question and for allowing me the opportunity to explain my statement as it relates to making some things known up front, agreed to, and respected by both the husband and wife.
Please know that I am specifically referring to having discussions with your possible future-life partner about each others' goals/value system and agreeing to respect those values before the marriage. I agree with you that it is impossible to discern everything up front, but there are
some things that can and should be revealed, but aren't. Often times, these secrets come back to haunt the marriage.
If you will indulge, please consider this: There is a situation whereas the man believes in big families and wants 7 children, but the woman does not want to have more than 2 children. They love each other very much, but never actually discuss how many children they will have. Secretly, the woman knows that the man wants a big family. However, she intentionally avoids such discussion because she knows it would probably prevent the marriage from taking place.
The first conversation about the size of the family takes place after the wife has the second child. The husband is adamant about having a large, but the wife is totally unwilling to have anymore children. Neither will be considerate of the other's wishes. Given this hypothetical situation, what do you suggest should happen? A compromise?
I believe that many problems that develop in marriages are a result of the partner(s) not fully understanding nor appreciating what they were committing to before they said, "I do." This is why I believe that having up front conversations about key issues of the marriage are essential. While I agree that it is not possible to prepare in advance for all the challenges that life punches will throw at you, one can prepare for some of these challenges by having a game plan, i.e., deciding in advance what will be the roles, expectations, and individual responsibilities of each partner.
I feel that many people disagree with my assertion of "ultimate decision maker." Please refer to post #55, paragraphs 3 & 5 about how I define this term. It is my opinion that the healthier the marriage, the rarer the need will be for an "ultimate decision maker." In fact, for some marriages, the term is non existent----like yours. And I think that what you have makes plenty of sense...I congratulate you.
Thank you again for allowing me the opportunity to explain my view on this thought provoking and often time controversial issue.