This one goes straight to the pope
- Thread starter Geo
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
There is a whole side of me of which you are not aware and have no comprehension.Who are you and how did you hack into Andy's account?
Here's another good one-
What is happening to poor Benedict is like the worst parts of antisematism---
Pope's Personal Preacher: Accusations Against Benedict Are Like 'Anti-Semitism'
What is happening to poor Benedict is like the worst parts of antisematism---
Pope's Personal Preacher: Accusations Against Benedict Are Like 'Anti-Semitism'
I promise to stop "persecuting" them if they make their sworn representatives stop molesting children. :angry:
Tear down the wall of silence in the Roman Catholic Church. - By Christopher Hitchens - Slate Magazine
excerpt:... here is an ancient Christian church that deals in awful certainties when it comes to outright condemnation of sins like divorce, abortion, contraception, and homosexuality between consenting adults. For these offenses there is no forgiveness, and moral absolutism is invoked. Yet let the subject be the rape and torture of defenseless children, and at once every kind of wiggle room and excuse-making is invoked. What can one say of a church that finds so much latitude for a crime so ghastly that no morally normal person can even think of it without shuddering?
excerpt:... here is an ancient Christian church that deals in awful certainties when it comes to outright condemnation of sins like divorce, abortion, contraception, and homosexuality between consenting adults. For these offenses there is no forgiveness, and moral absolutism is invoked. Yet let the subject be the rape and torture of defenseless children, and at once every kind of wiggle room and excuse-making is invoked. What can one say of a church that finds so much latitude for a crime so ghastly that no morally normal person can even think of it without shuddering?
.
Very interesting thoughts from the writer James Carroll who is a former Catholic priest.
?It's not the Catholic Church that's being destroyed here. It's the Catholic fundamentalist clerical culture, which has betrayed the Church in a very basic way. It's being exposed for what it is.?
He began by arguing that the Church is now under the control of a particular kind of fundamentalism;
We're familiar with Protestant fundamentalism, but there's a Catholic fundamentalism. Only instead of treating the verses of the Bible literally, Catholic fundamentalism has a disproportionate regard for the statements of the Pope. And what we have here [in the abuse scandals] is a revelation of the limits . . . and even of the corruptions of Pope-centered Catholicism.
This emphasis on clerical power and the power of the papacy is not an old tradition, but a relatively new innovation:
You have to go back to the nineteenth century when this obsession with Papal power began to take hold in the Catholic Church. It was when the Pope lost his temporal power over the Papal States in the middle of Italy in 1870, that the bishops rallied around the Pope and gave him ultimate spiritual power. It was only then, for example, in that Council, Vatican I, [that] the infallibility of the Pope was declared to be a doctrine of the Church. Many Catholics think that's an ancient tradition. It is not. It's a modern tradition. . . . That system was a corruption of the Christian tradition.
link:
Ian Masters: James Carroll: The Catholic Church Has To Be Rescued From Catholic Fundamentalism
.
Very interesting thoughts from the writer James Carroll who is a former Catholic priest.
?It's not the Catholic Church that's being destroyed here. It's the Catholic fundamentalist clerical culture, which has betrayed the Church in a very basic way. It's being exposed for what it is.?
He began by arguing that the Church is now under the control of a particular kind of fundamentalism;
We're familiar with Protestant fundamentalism, but there's a Catholic fundamentalism. Only instead of treating the verses of the Bible literally, Catholic fundamentalism has a disproportionate regard for the statements of the Pope. And what we have here [in the abuse scandals] is a revelation of the limits . . . and even of the corruptions of Pope-centered Catholicism.
This emphasis on clerical power and the power of the papacy is not an old tradition, but a relatively new innovation:
You have to go back to the nineteenth century when this obsession with Papal power began to take hold in the Catholic Church. It was when the Pope lost his temporal power over the Papal States in the middle of Italy in 1870, that the bishops rallied around the Pope and gave him ultimate spiritual power. It was only then, for example, in that Council, Vatican I, [that] the infallibility of the Pope was declared to be a doctrine of the Church. Many Catholics think that's an ancient tradition. It is not. It's a modern tradition. . . . That system was a corruption of the Christian tradition.
link:
Ian Masters: James Carroll: The Catholic Church Has To Be Rescued From Catholic Fundamentalism
.
Not sure what your definition of organized religion is, but I am sure there are more good ordinary Catholics who are loving, kind, working in their communites for good and would never harm a child than there are bad ones.
If you had said in "some" cases I would agree, but I don't agree to "most" cases nor would I agree that all organized religion is more about money and politics.
When the earthquake hit Haiti and their plight became world news, millions of dollars were sent to their aid. However for many years the people of Haiti have suffered and who came to their aid when it was not world news; organized religious groups.
There is tremendous good that organized religious groups do on a daily basis that will never make the news because it is not shocking.
What has happend to these children over the years is horrible and definitely something has to be done and there should be some type of punishment for the crimes committed, but it's wrong to paint everyone with the same brush for the wrongs of some.
Last edited:
I agree with what you posted, Minnie. The followers- the flock of organized religion really do give and give and the world is generally a better place with them in it.
I don't think Andy was talking about the folks in the audience attending the Sunday performance. I think he was talking about the company that produces the show.
I don't think Andy was talking about the folks in the audience attending the Sunday performance. I think he was talking about the company that produces the show.
"some type of punishment" for people protected by the hierarchy fully aware of the crimes committed? would you ask for "some type of punishment for non-clergy? i smell a massively rationalized double standard. the church does good so everything is mostly ok? this type of organized abuse is far worse than an abusive person acting alone. it is borne of arrogance fed by power. how can you not see this? is it because of the specific perpetrators? do you have faith it will self correct?
Last edited:
There is no double standard in any type of punishment as far as I am concerned, those in the wrong need to be punished, period even if that includes the Pope. If he is truly in the wrong he deserves the punishment as much as anyone.
I am not judge and jury so as to the punishment or who deserves it, I will leave that to those more qualifiied.
My point is that not everyone that believes in organized religion, be they Catholic, Protestant, Hindu or Muslin are all the same and they are all definitely not just interested in money or poliltics.
It would be just as wrong to say all Democrats or Republicans act and believe the same as the leaders of each party.
I just do not support stereotyping of any person simply because they are a member of a larger group.
Last edited: