Going to leave that to the FBI. Me, being an amateur, says that simple Theft and Obstruction is the starter, but they added espionage on the Affidavit so they probably know more than me and you.So what statute should we be looking at?
Going to leave that to the FBI. Me, being an amateur, says that simple Theft and Obstruction is the starter, but they added espionage on the Affidavit so they probably know more than me and you.So what statute should we be looking at?
Not one of repubs I know is against law and order at all, this is silly talkWe should recall how this was made public, it wasn’t the FBI or DOJ it was Russia’s Agent Orange whining on his social media site.
Only after his extensive lying did they respond to set the record straight. Of course by that time the “Back the Blue,” “Law and Order” republicans had already circled the propaganda wagons and the MAGA cult was at full level Code Orange.
Here is a timeline of the event:
![]()
A timeline of the investigation into Trump's Mar-a-Lago docs
WASHINGTON (AP) — The search of former President Donald Trump' s Mar-a-Lago club for classified documents and other government records may have come as a surprise to the public.apnews.com
Do you see this is the flaw in your approach, you have stated numerously the Trump is 'guilty' but without knowing the law you can you make this assumption? Why not state that you think or want him to be guilty, guilty means the case is closed. Just my opinionGoing to leave that to the FBI. Me, being an amateur, says that simple Theft and Obstruction is the starter, but they added espionage on the Affidavit so they probably know more than me and you.
f**k no, that was a sad day for America. Or are you asking if I want to push back on the courts. I am a little different then some of you guys, the second the court found him guilty and he walked the victims people should have handled it. What do you think?Curious, did you believe OJ Simpson was not guilty?
It is the word stole that assumes guilt that I can't get behind. For me this needs to run its course before I will make a statement like thatI believe you missed the most important part of my analysis. It doesn't matter if he de-classified the documents or not. It doesn't matter if he had the right to de-classify the documents while he was president*. The salient point is he stole government documents and he cannot show just cause for having them. And it is documented.
Is that what all trumpers are like? You should like the great uniter in office. Clowns know comicalTrumpers are all alike. They have 52 different useless arguments, and they try to play them like cards. As soon as they lose one argument, they will jump to another one hoping you will forget that it's already been debunked. It's sad, yet comical.
Never got a loan where the bank didn't do its own appraisal
This took me three seconds to look up on the google. I guess you are really not going to be bothered by looking up the facts in this case.So what statute should we be looking at?
Ok Mr. Apologist on how many loan applications have you lied?Never got a loan where the bank didn't do its own appraisal