Redfish Village Beach Access

[John R]

John R...if those are the rules of the thread, so be it; I'm use to a subject line meaning that you stay on that subject...live and learn!

It seems like you haven't learned much during your short time here.

A suggestion for you to consider; in the future when you create a thread, why don't you just name it John R Miscellaneous 1, John R Miscellaneous 2, etc. That way everyone will know what to expect from your personal, steer it anyway I want too, thread.

Ouch, that really stung.

Thanks for reminding me about posting to Brad's thread. I couldn't find it for a while and I thought I remembered your suggesting the county get property by eminent domain for that thread's purpose.

It could be one way to get property, when someone who's property is on the verge of collapse, and they can't afford to repair it to legal code. Would you be satisfied with a potentially dangerous derelict property literally hanging out? Do you have a different idea? Please respond in the appropriate thread.

What really sucks here is how mean and ugly you're being about the pretty lady's name!!!

Because I won't tell you a bit of information you desire I'm mean and ugly? It must be a really slow day up in BMB. Or, are you just feeling a bit lonely these days? my response to advising you to stay on track was modeled on yours to me. kettle, is that you?

of course parking problems related to RFV's impact on your neighborhood were completely ignored.

 

[edroedrog]

It seems like you haven't learned much during your short time here.



Ouch, that really stung.




It could be one way to get property, when someone who's property is on the verge of collapse, and they can't afford to repair it to legal code. Would you be satisfied with a potentially dangerous derelict property literally hanging out? Do you have a different idea? Please respond in the appropriate thread.



Because I won't tell you a bit of information you desire I'm mean and ugly? It must be a really slow day up in BMB. Or, are you just feeling a bit lonely these days? my response to advising you to stay on track was modeled on yours to me. kettle, is that you?

of course parking problems related to RFV's impact on your neighborhood were completely ignored.

SJ-You are wrong. It is not just about parking it is about developers coming down and taking over doing what they want to without the communities input.

Again would you want this next to your property? I think not. JR-Tell your friends at Lying Trailer Park they need to step it up and come clean with the facts..

Looks like we have a lot of reader checking this thread out since I have joined SoWal. Not saying it is because of me maybe it is because some facts are finally coming out on this group and everyone is looking for facts.

We want the facts not a lot of pro bono folks on the site trying to confuse the situation.

 

[Smiling JOe]

JR-You are wrong. It is not just about parking it is about developers coming down and taking over doing what they want to without the communities input.

Again would you want this next to your property? I think not. JR-Tell your friends at Lying Trailer Park they need to step it up and come clean with the facts..

Looks like we have a lot of reader checking this thread out since I have joined SoWal. Not saying it is because of me maybe it is because some facts are finally coming out on this group and everyone is looking for facts.

We want the facts not a lot of pro bono folks on the site trying to confuse the situation.

FYI - I am the one who keeps referring to the lack of parking.

 

[edroedrog]

FYI - I am the one who keeps referring to the lack of parking.

WOW SJ-You are on it. I am about the facts so it is nice that you stepped up.. I repaired the typo wonder if LyingFish Trailer Park is going to fix the typo that they hand out? Maybe you can invite them to the hood of your car.

I understand they did at one point and had to do some shredding.

Posting the facts as always.

 

[chrisv]

Looks like we have a lot of reader checking this thread out since I have joined SoWal. Not saying it is because of me maybe it is because some facts are finally coming out on this group and everyone is looking for facts.

No, that's just me and my OCD counting problem. I just cannot believe that you only have 38 posts, it seems more like 3800. Kurt, please check the counter....

 

[edroedrog]

No, that's just me and my OCD counting problem. I just cannot believe that you only have 38 posts, it seems more like 3800. Kurt, please check the counter....

Kurt, do not bother with the counter. ChrisV you are correct 38 posts. Yea it would seem like 3800 to you because it hurts you insiders at LyingFish Trailer Park to read them. Glad to know I am making a difference.

Let me explain my post to you. Seem like a lot of people are very interested. It may have something to do with the facts that are being posted.. Maybe it is contract holders reading the facts maybe it is the folks within 300 feet who are not being notified of the meetings. Not sure but it is helping me with my endeavors.

SJ-Have you been updated by insiders as to how they got the January 11th meeting moved up? I know the agenda comes out tomorrow and can not wait to see what all they have to discuss. I am so glad they got it moved up. I can not wait to see how local servers dance around this one. Surprises me though seems like LyingFish would want more time. Oh forgot they do not have much time. Like GEs response to the TRC on this one. That letter had some great facts in it about Lot 2. What do you think SJ? Did you like it? I know a letter from a lawyer does not mean much but it does state the facts about the property.

 

[Smiling JOe]

SJ-Have you been updated by insiders as to how they got the January 11th meeting moved up? I know the agenda comes out tomorrow and can not wait to see what all they have to discuss. I am so glad they got it moved up. I can not wait to see how local servers dance around this one. Surprises me though seems like LyingFish would want more time. Oh forgot they do not have much time. Like GEs response to the TRC on this one. That letter had some great facts in it about Lot 2. What do you think SJ? Did you like it? I know a letter from a lawyer does not mean much but it does state the facts about the property.

Perhaps if you didn't abbreviate everything without prior notes of abbreviations, I could comment on it, but I have no clue as to what you are talking about.

I don't keep track of insiders on this project, so again, I don't know.

In general, you seem to lump all non-Gulf front owners in with Redfish Village. I have no idea why this is so, but you did it once again.

I am still trying to determine what pertanent facts you have brought to this discussion and which lies. Please don't see my questioning of your "questionable pertanent facts" as defending Redfish Village. Anyone who has read my posts knows that I am not for this, nor the other three developments in BMB.

 

[buster]

Edroedrog, I agree with SJ. You are being very dense. I guess you think it's cute to try to talk in riddles but it's just nonsense to us. Just speak in plain english about what you know to be fact instead of claiming to post facts. We really have no idea what you're trying to say other than smearing the developer and the project and claiming to know all the details. Why not just say what you mean plainly? I don't even have a clue whether you're for or against it except when you call people liars.

And stop lableing everyone as for or against the project. Some people may not have their minds made up. This discussion is degenerating into a pissing contest which is a shame because everybody seems like they should be working together.

 

[edroedrog]

Perhaps if you didn't abbreviate everything without prior notes of abbreviations, I could comment on it, but I have no clue as to what you are talking about.

I don't keep track of insiders on this project, so again, I don't know.

In general, you seem to lump all non-Gulf front owners in with Redfish Village. I have no idea why this is so, but you did it once again.

I am still trying to determine what pertanent facts you have brought to this discussion and which lies. Please don't see my questioning of your "questionable pertanent facts" as defending Redfish Village. Anyone who has read my posts knows that I am not for this, nor the other three developments in BMB.

SJ sometimes I think you are for the project or have other interest. I just want to know what legal foot LyingFish has to stand on? I know from your earlier post you are not a lawyer but I do have to ask the question. KT still has not proved me wrong yet nor did he get me the letter he said was sent back to Lois La Seur. I hope you correct me if I am wrong on my post too. I do not have a problem with that at all. I am sorry if LyingFish Trailer Park and Hard2Sell offends you but it is true. Tell me that they have not lied to the community tell me that they have not lied to their investors tell me that they have not. Please do because they have and they continue to even after being told by Lois La Seur in a letter dated May 5 2006 to Mr. Zietlin (Planning Manager Walton County) and cc Hard2Sell as well. They have had meeting where they did not inform the community and they have also bought another Lot to try in slide one in on the community. How many times do they need to be told that we do not want this in our community? I know that people have been sending their concerns to Cindy Meadows (District 5 Commissioner) to let her know that they have not been properly notified.(i.e. certified mail) because they do live within 300 feet of the proposed Lot 2 development. Am I wrong yet?

I have been posting the facts. If you read some of my earlier post you will realize the TRC is the Technical Review committee and that GE is who sent the letter to TRC for Lot 2.

I do not know what I would have to gain by lying to you about this project.

 

[edroedrog]

Edroedrog, I agree with SJ. You are being very dense. I guess you think it's cute to try to talk in riddles but it's just nonsense to us. Just speak in plain english about what you know to be fact instead of claiming to post facts. We really have no idea what you're trying to say other than smearing the developer and the project and claiming to know all the details. Why not just say what you mean plainly? I don't even have a clue whether you're for or against it except when you call people liars.

And stop lableing everyone as for or against the project. Some people may not have their minds made up. This discussion is degenerating into a pissing contest which is a shame because everybody seems like they should be working together.

Buster do not be so obtuse. I am obviously against PrivateBA. If you would take a moment and read my post you can plainly see that I do not want this to happen. As for the smearing the development I have only called them LyingFish Trailer Park and from what I have read and seen that is the truth.

As for working together I have received several emails from folks on SoWal that have appreciated the input. So who are to tell me what to and not to post? Come on I am still waiting on someone to prove me wrong. I want the facts.