Dave Rauschkolb why do you believe you are right about CU and private property rights and everyone else is wrong? You nor any CU advocate have disputed any facts that dispute CU alternative "beliefs" on this thread. You have only called property law facts ridiculous and whined about pseudonyms, that many historic figures like Ben Franklin, Mark Twain, and many others, including the prolific in-credible CU contributors on this forum use.
Prove these posts from just this thread wrong. Goes to the CU credibility. Goes to if you only have little ditties, cute signs, internet slides from bizarre CU activist, go pound sand responses, or do you have credible facts or law or anything other than your unsubstantiated CU beliefs or opinions? Your are right about one thing - your points are circular, challenge to present any facts?-rhetoric-facts?-rhetoric-facts? ... just not credible rhetoric.
"Talking about credibility of facts. Here is a simple Yes or No question; is there any Seaside business/LLC, excluding the original property owner, Seaside Community Development Corporation and Seaside HOAs, that own private property in Seaside seaward from the beach top of the dunes, the dune walkovers, to the MHWL?
Is the Seaside Community Development Corporation intervening against Walton Commissioner’s litigation against 650+ other private beachfront owners to affirm public customary use of private property?"
Customary Use Will Destroy Our 30A Legacy
Right or Wrong? "BTW. NO Seaside 30A beach-side LLC business owns beachfront. The Seaside developer owns the dunes, constructed walkovers, and dry sand to the MHWL in Seaside. All fact in Walton Property Appraiser and Clerk of Court public records. The Seaside developer is 1 of the 650+ private property owners intervening against Walton’s public customary use of private property litigation too."
Customary Use Will Destroy Our 30A Legacy
If anyone makes a public statement like; “I personally am a
beachfront owner in Seaside with my restaurant” and posts it in the public domain; is that a, right or wrong fact? There is a legal difference between beachfront and beach-side or beach-view and if one is a
beachfront property owner entitled to intervene against (or for) Walton Commissioners' CU litigation. Goes to credibility of any other CU belief.
Customary Use Will Destroy Our 30A Legacy
Want to address the impending economic "Ghost Town"-doom facing Walton County since April 1, 2017 or July 1, 2018? or that tourist taxes are up 17.8%?
Do you dispute Walton Commissioners were considering customary use of private property as far back as 2007 or who is responsible for the ill will in South Walton?
Want to address Vizcaya private (public) property? I guess you think Walton TDC Beach Director is wrong about private beach access easements? How about Quiet Title in Blue Mountain beach? How about there are only a "handful" of evil sneaky BFOs orchestrating a Federal beach fortification plan and State of FL HB631 to keep you and the public off all private beachfront property? Of the 13 miles of private beaches how many BFO have enforced their private property rights? 10 miles? 5 miles? 1 mile? Or is FBFA making a mountain out of a mole hill and fear mongering to advance a CU agenda to incite the masses on antisocial media with intentional misinformation?
If you can not or refuse to answer these simple questions I'd say BFOs are right (within the laws and American morality encompassed in those laws) and more credible with facts or prove BFOs property rights wrong with credible verifiable information. Not baseless rhetoric, cute signs, and shout downs that You're Wrong and despicable.
