Emerald Drifter - What are your proposed positive solutions that do not include removal of constitutional property rights that we can discuss? Save the question on removing constitutional property rights (right of exclusion) for the court since it is abundantly clear that neither side is going to compromise on that one. But surely you have positive solutions outside of that?
First and foremost, removing or severely limiting commercial vendor chairs from the beach will remove a lot of pressure and open up space for the public. I understand that some of these guys have been doing this a while, but this county is absolutely booming; there are many other avenues for entrepreneurial minds to build a business here.
Is the 30A ecosystem your number one priority or something else?
Yes, you can say that. More specifically, the coastal dune lakes and our state forest land and protecting them from encroachment. What are your top priorities?
Preservation of what we have and what made people fall in love with SoWal. I was not a preservationist until I moved here 12 years ago. When property IS developed, approach it like Seaside, and St. Joe properties have done. Preserve as much of the local flora as possible. It is unique.
I liked mputal proposal to get some leaders on the BCC, in particular leadership for the protection of our unique 30A ecosystem.
We have to. And with the number of residents (voters) who are moving to/reside south of the bay are increasing. Too much to go into here about how voting is structured in Walton County to preserve north of the bay as the power center, but this will change as more and more people move into SoWal. (someone who has lived her much longer than I can offer an explanation on this). Who do you think on the BCC is the current strongest leader for 30A ecosystem protection?
Commissioner Nipper, no doubt. And she alone (heroically) proved this when she made a stand in regards to holding the county accountable regarding the county's stormwater runoff train wreck in the Sandestin area. How do we encourage him/her?
A kind word/email/phone call? Sharing your ideas for solutions? Who is the weakest on protecting the 30A ecosystem and how do we change that? Three of the BCC positions are open in the next election. I personally think Bill Fletcher would have (and still would) make a great member of the BCC.
I agree. I do not know him personally, but I think he is a leader in the truest sense. Shame he was thrown under the bus because he was willing to think about a compromise and keep the county out of the courts. Makes me wonder what would have happened if he was elected?
I fully believe the core issue is managed beach density. How do we REDUCE 4 millions tourists on the beach to a level that can be sustained without destruction of the 30A ecosystem?
Short answer right now, I don't know. But I notice other areas struggling with the exact same issues we are dealing with: Sedona, Arizona is dealing with the exact same issues we are. Massive numbers of folks, traffic, bigger and bigger development, mini hotels, no long term affordable rentals due to short term/Air BnB. Also, most national parks are dealing with way too many people. Zion National Park, for example, does not allow individual vehicles from May to October (I think). Shuttles only and only park shuttles. Park and ride. What is that level and how do you regulate it? Less than now? How to regulate it? I think it will be economic forces, national level, that will reduce the masses, but thats a different discussion.
I believe both sides could support
Ancient Customary Use defined a few posts ago. Entitlement use is different.
Although I have only lived here full time 12 years, I have been visiting since the 70s. There has been an unspoken, understood idea of the everyone using the beach in a respectful way. Respectful to the upland owner and respectful to the beach itself and the beach wildlife. I believe that when we residents bring mutual respect back into our actions and discussions that much of the quarreling, conflict, and discord will come down a notch or two. Further, we must demand this from our visitors. They are more than welcome here, but they need to respect our home.
Let's see if we can have a positive conversation by leaving entitlement use out of it.
What common ground can we discuss in a positive way?