lol. Caroling, my property has nothing to do with beach access. I own a piece of property on which the County built and maintained a single lane dirt road. The road was no more than 12 foot in width, and even though they had deeded property on the other side of my property, still recognized in the County records to be used for a road, they put the road on the property which I own. It was used for many years by others in the area. A few years ago, without requesting permission, the County decided to pave the roads, and in doing so, they widened the right of way to 60'ft , which now impacted more of the property. The County tells me that they had prescriptive easement for the road since it had been used for a long period of time. They never even had a legal taking of the increased right of way, paying for it, nor did they offer to exchange what they took for the adjacent property dedicated on plats for road, which is a smaller property than that which they took. I can understand parts of that. No big deal. However, if now, the County now changes their way of thinking, in this beach issue, saying that the beach hasn't been customarily used by the public, and no longer allows the public to sunbathe on the beach, they are not being consistent in their actions, and are showing favoritism to certain property owners. To show their inconsistency, I will do as Tim Pauls did, and barricade the road which was constructed on my property, not because I don't want people to use it, but to show the County that what they are doing with the beach is wrong. You can come sunbathe on my road anytime, but watch out for the cars and trucks.
