Spencer said:
If the seller has a resonable sense of value of the property, then it's not usually a bad deal for the seller either.
If the seller had a "reasonable sense of value" and applied that knowledge based on present market conditions (excessive inventory--very few buyers) when pricing their home for sale,
they wouldn't need an auctioneer to sell their home.
I believe folks who go to these auctions fall into 3 categories (1) People who are actually looking to buy a place at the cheapest price possible; (2) Late-night Infomerical Devotees who think they're on their way to making a killing in the real estate market, and (3) Owners of other properties and realtors from the surrounding area who are curious to see what's happening in town (and probably farming for potential buyers).
Aside from the obvious need for an auction for the average joe selling a home (meaning they want to unload it quickly with no hassles), a lot of these folks selling their homes at auction today take the view that they are selling "fine and rare pieces of art" that are highly prized by many folks eager to out-bid each other at ever increasing prices...nothing could be further from the truth. People going to these auctions are looking for bargain-bin prices...meaning BELOW what properties sold for in the last couple of years.
There may be an odd property that fetches a fairly decent price, but that will clearly be the exception and not the rule (and probably the example the auctioneer uses when he's pushing his services to potential clients).
Too many sellers have not reached a sufficient level of financial pain to price their homes to market...and buyers (especially if they are investors) are not willing to catch a falling knife. With ever-increasing inventory hitting the market day-by-day and prices starting to show a tiny bit of softening, buyers are content to park their money in a CD and wait for the prices to come down to them.