Walton County Customary Use in the News

[Matt J]

Greedy is the way beachfront owners are seen by the other 99.999%, like it or not.

Maybe they're not all disgusting but following the directions of their masters, the lawyers and politicians.

Disgusting? That's the people who actually put property lines on sand and dunes and first profited. They are the ones who should be vilified.

You should probably learn why beach front property was deeded to the water. It's very interesting and only speaks to the old ways of Walton county.

 

[Matt J]

Look at jasmine dunes in sea grove. Judge green gave them beach front in last 3 years. The tax appraiser gave tax deeds . Went infrontvof judge green who granted deeds. Never had a county commissioner question it or signed posted. Look at any deed in gulf shore manor of beach . All were given in last 20 years. So basically the tax people and judge green gave away beach and commissioners never stopped it. Then they let judge green be the one who decides outcome. Ethics complaint should be done

Judge Green did his job, would you rather a rouge judge playing by their own rules?

What you are talking about is called quiet title and it's a perfectly legal process, but the private beachers have bastardized the process to take land.any of the parcels you are talking about only "technically" own to the MHWL as they sued a long dead developer or their corporation stating they intended for the property owner to own that land too. If that dead person or corporation responds then it might go a different way. I'll let you figure out why they don't go a different way.

 

[Beach days]

Then why wasn’t the county commissioners notified. And why wasn’t there a public notice. Like any other property

 

[Beach days]

They gave away public beach with out a notice to county or public. Now he gets to decide right and wrong. The gulf shore manor beach was 1 of only 2 private beaches. They took Santa Clara from developers and never even had a deed for property when they built beach access.

 

[Beach days]

Look at judge wells property in camp creek . His property is one of only few that didn’t get beach front. Probably because he knew wasn’t right or legal

 

[Matt J]

Then why wasn’t the county commissioners notified. And why wasn’t there a public notice. Like any other property

I understand, but please understand in the quiet title action it is one party suing another, the county isn't named. In fact as much as I want to continue explaining this, our acting county attorney did a great job explaining why the county CAN'T intervene in these at the November 19 BCC meeting during public comments.

 

[Matt J]

They gave away public beach with out a notice to county or public. Now he gets to decide right and wrong. The gulf shore manor beach was 1 of only 2 private beaches. They took Santa Clara from developers and never even had a deed for property when they built beach access.

Huh?

 

[Beach days]

They never sued . The county gave them there beach front for 50 dollars a year tax deed

 

[Beach days]

They never sued . The county gave them there beach front for 50 dollars a year tax deed

Message me and I will give you my phone number. Matt j and explain what has happened

 

[Matt J]

Message me and I will give you my phone number. Matt j and explain what has happened

Perhaps this plat showing the land not included will help. That means the county owned or had rights to the land prior to the plat.

You can view the entire thing here:

Session Has Expired

PB 9 Page 3

Since you sent me down a rabbit hole, here's the original plat of Gulf Shores Beach:



Above is the original plat (PB 3 Page 23) showing that area as a public road with a public park, everything not denoted as a lot or the Hotel were dedicated to the public. That makes that the county's land. They don't need a deed. I won't argue that point until you show me the counties deed for any road they maintain.