Patience my dear, patience...
1. I respect that, although I don't think I want to talk to employees about this, never know who is on who's side.
2. I do not understand what you are talking about. How can it be against the law to campaign for someone? Is this Russia?
3. What does a DOT guy know about law enforcement? Ya'll taking over Public Works?
4. OK.
5. How can leave not be valid? Either you have it or you don't. Once again I am confused. It does sound like the taxpayers are getting ******* in here somewhere, but I just can't put my finger on it.
2) It is not against the law, that is the stupidity of the whole thing. That sums up the past 8 year of WCSO Law Enforcment Leadership. RJ sent a lap dog (bulldog) to attempt to get a warrant signed by the ASA's Office on a fellow Officer...
Fact, research it. Make a call, get aggressive. That's our tax dollar at work for ya. Just like a test track, a over inflated budget, a dead whale, cars to Alabama, etc...
3) DOT (Dept. of Transportation). They just yanked in millions of dollars of dope with DFS PD. Traffic Stop = Dope Bust = good police work...;-)
4) OK
5) Leave is a very odd term. If you think you have it, you might not. Just like money in the budget... Taxpayers "getting ********in here" is putting it very lightly. Why do you think I have been "Watching" all along? What I write is, to my knowledge, factual. I put forth what wrongs are being done and bring up things that deputies cannot speak of (due to FEAR). That fear is going to go away. Mike Adkinson is FAIR. I know its only a couple of vowels difference, but what a big difference it is.
Seriously, the leave issue is one that bothers me. Instead of getting Over Time, you get "leave". Leave is given to your supervisor and it is up to them to deduct/report it. Seeing that supervisors are walking warrants for their own officers arrests to the ASA's office, you have to wonder...:shock:. It's more then that, but this gave me a good segway into the warrant piece...sorry, had to take it.
w